CFD comparison of water based SiO2 nanofluid with benchmark MEA amine solution for CO2 capture through porous membrane contactor

Abnormal emission of environmentally-hazardous greenhouse pollutants (mainly CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere have motivated global researchers to develop green, affordable and effective techniques to maximize their separation from different feed. To reach this aim, application of more effective and greener absorbing solutions is of great importance to decrease the harmful disadvantages of benchmark amine solutions like corrosion, eco-detriment and complexity of operation. In the current decades, nanofluids have shown great ability of application in membrane-based separation industries owing to their outstanding privileges like high specific surface area, great stability and feasibility of employment in both hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes. The main novelty of this scientific investigation is the efficiency comparison of SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid with monoethanolamine (MEA) benchmark solution for CO<sub>2</sub> capture in gas-liquid membrane contactor (MC) using CFD approach. Analysis of the results showed the approximately similar performance of SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid compared to MEA for separating CO<sub>2</sub> (98.8% using SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid VS 99.5% using MEA). Despite lower efficiency, SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid can be well identified as an environmentally-friendly and efficient alternative absorbent for use in CO<sub>2</sub>-separation industries instead of chemically-detrimental MEA solutions. Additionally, effects of some membrane/module parameters like number of fibers, module length and gas velocity on the separation of CO<sub>2</sub> are explained, comprehensively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95873-3
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CFD comparison of water based SiO2 nanofluid with benchmark MEA amine solution for CO2 capture through porous membrane contactor

Hadil Faris Alotaibi, Nagaraj Patil, V.K. Bupesh Raja, Deepak K. Gupta et al.
Scientific Reports
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
article

CFD comparison of water based SiO2 nanofluid with benchmark MEA amine solution for CO2 capture through porous membrane contactor

Hadil Faris Alotaibi, Nagaraj Patil, V.K. Bupesh Raja, Deepak K. Gupta, Bhavesh Kanabar, Abhinav Kumar, Dhirendra Nath Thatoi, Ahmed Ali Mohsen, Debasish Shit
article en

Abstract

Abnormal emission of environmentally-hazardous greenhouse pollutants (mainly CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere have motivated global researchers to develop green, affordable and effective techniques to maximize their separation from different feed. To reach this aim, application of more effective and greener absorbing solutions is of great importance to decrease the harmful disadvantages of benchmark amine solutions like corrosion, eco-detriment and complexity of operation. In the current decades, nanofluids have shown great ability of application in membrane-based separation industries owing to their outstanding privileges like high specific surface area, great stability and feasibility of employment in both hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes. The main novelty of this scientific investigation is the efficiency comparison of SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid with monoethanolamine (MEA) benchmark solution for CO<sub>2</sub> capture in gas-liquid membrane contactor (MC) using CFD approach. Analysis of the results showed the approximately similar performance of SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid compared to MEA for separating CO<sub>2</sub> (98.8% using SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid VS 99.5% using MEA). Despite lower efficiency, SiO<sub>2</sub>-based nanofluid can be well identified as an environmentally-friendly and efficient alternative absorbent for use in CO<sub>2</sub>-separation industries instead of chemically-detrimental MEA solutions. Additionally, effects of some membrane/module parameters like number of fibers, module length and gas velocity on the separation of CO<sub>2</sub> are explained, comprehensively.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Jain University (IN), Ural Federal University (RU), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Alsalam University College (IQ), Western Caspian University (AZ), Iraqi University (IQ), Marwadi University (IN), Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Graphic Era University (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.