Yield and Stability of Three Tropical Forage Grasses Cultivated as Pure or Mixed Stands

ABSTRACT Multispecific pastures are considered more sustainable to animal production than monocultures. However, studies on mixtures of tropical grasses are underexplored. We aimed to assess whether a mixture of three contrasting growth strategies of perennial tropical forage grasses could outperform their respective monocultures in terms of forage yield and stability. The four treatments included three perennial tropical forage grasses: Andropogon gambagrass (AG; Andropogon gayanus cv. Planaltina), Massai guineagrass [MG; Megathyrsus maximus cv. Massai] and Piatã palisadegrass [PP; Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã], cultivated as monocultures and as a mixture of the three species. Treatments were randomly assigned to sixteen 180 m 2 plots and managed intermittently under manual harvest at pre‐ and post‐harvest heights of 35 and 17.5 cm, respectively, for 2 years. The botanical composition of the mixture remained relatively stable, with a predominance of MG (68.9%), followed by PP (20.1%) and AG (6.8%). Annual forage yield varied between years ( p = 0.0017) with a difference of 3974 kg DM ha −1 year −1 , but not according to treatments ( p > 0.05) with an average of 23,012 kg DM ha −1 year −1 . No effect was observed for the intra‐annual forage yield variance among treatments ( p > 0.05). The association among PP, MG and AG in a mixture allows species to coexist with a relatively stable botanical composition, as well as forage yield and stability, similar to their monocultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Grass and Forage Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12717
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yield and Stability of Three Tropical Forage Grasses Cultivated as Pure or Mixed Stands

Paulo Gonçalves Duchini, Carlos Tadeu dos Santos Dias, Emanoella Karol Saraiva Otaviano, Sila Carneiro da Silva et al.
Grass and Forage Science
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Yield and Stability of Three Tropical Forage Grasses Cultivated as Pure or Mixed Stands

Paulo Gonçalves Duchini, Carlos Tadeu dos Santos Dias, Emanoella Karol Saraiva Otaviano, Sila Carneiro da Silva, Rodrigo Amorim Barbosa, Alex Marciano dos Santos Silva, André Fischer Sbrissia, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio, Alexandre Fameli Mammana, Caio Macret Gomes, Larissa Fernanda Garcia, Gislaine Cristina Barro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multispecific pastures are considered more sustainable to animal production than monocultures. However, studies on mixtures of tropical grasses are underexplored. We aimed to assess whether a mixture of three contrasting growth strategies of perennial tropical forage grasses could outperform their respective monocultures in terms of forage yield and stability. The four treatments included three perennial tropical forage grasses: Andropogon gambagrass (AG; Andropogon gayanus cv. Planaltina), Massai guineagrass [MG; Megathyrsus maximus cv. Massai] and Piatã palisadegrass [PP; Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã], cultivated as monocultures and as a mixture of the three species. Treatments were randomly assigned to sixteen 180 m 2 plots and managed intermittently under manual harvest at pre‐ and post‐harvest heights of 35 and 17.5 cm, respectively, for 2 years. The botanical composition of the mixture remained relatively stable, with a predominance of MG (68.9%), followed by PP (20.1%) and AG (6.8%). Annual forage yield varied between years ( p = 0.0017) with a difference of 3974 kg DM ha −1 year −1 , but not according to treatments ( p > 0.05) with an average of 23,012 kg DM ha −1 year −1 . No effect was observed for the intra‐annual forage yield variance among treatments ( p > 0.05). The association among PP, MG and AG in a mixture allows species to coexist with a relatively stable botanical composition, as well as forage yield and stability, similar to their monocultures.

Grass and Forage ScienceVol. 80(2)
Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), The Ohio State University (US)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.