Assessment of cardiovascular risk from ambulatory blood pressure measurements enabled by deep learning

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), clinically defined as an elevated left ventricular mass index (LVMI), is a strong predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes1,2. Currently, measurements of LVMI are performed using transthoracic echocardiography, accessible only in clinical settings. In this study, we use data from an ambulatory blood pressure monitor, combined with laboratory test results and demographics data collected once, to investigate whether LVMI and LVH may be predicted and classified accurately. We developed and tested machine learning models using clinical data. For LVMI prediction, a mean absolute error of 10.4 ± 1.5 with our test set, and 15.6 ± 1.2 with an external test set, were achieved. For the classification of LVH and concentric LVH, mean areas under the curve of ≥0.95 and ≥0.93 were achieved, respectively. This study presents a method for accurately assessing cardiovascular risk using ambulatory measurements and highlights the use of waveform data for assessing hypertrophy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Biosensing
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44328-025-00037-y
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of cardiovascular risk from ambulatory blood pressure measurements enabled by deep learning

Samuel K. Sia, Vira Behnam, Joseph E. Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo et al.
1 links
npj Biosensing
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Assessment of cardiovascular risk from ambulatory blood pressure measurements enabled by deep learning

Samuel K. Sia, Vira Behnam, Joseph E. Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo, Terry L. Chern, Jannik Wiedenhaupt
article en

Abstract

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), clinically defined as an elevated left ventricular mass index (LVMI), is a strong predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes1,2. Currently, measurements of LVMI are performed using transthoracic echocardiography, accessible only in clinical settings. In this study, we use data from an ambulatory blood pressure monitor, combined with laboratory test results and demographics data collected once, to investigate whether LVMI and LVH may be predicted and classified accurately. We developed and tested machine learning models using clinical data. For LVMI prediction, a mean absolute error of 10.4 ± 1.5 with our test set, and 15.6 ± 1.2 with an external test set, were achieved. For the classification of LVH and concentric LVH, mean areas under the curve of ≥0.95 and ≥0.93 were achieved, respectively. This study presents a method for accurately assessing cardiovascular risk using ambulatory measurements and highlights the use of waveform data for assessing hypertrophy.

npj BiosensingVol. 2(1)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Stony Brook School (US), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.