Acceptance towards automated vehicles in urban traffic: A survey of pedestrian’s attitudes and behavioral intentions

• Pedestrian acceptance towards AVs in urban traffic was studied. • Key acceptance dimensions: AV Interaction, Traffic Climate, and Individual & Sociodemographic Factors. • Attitudes, crossing, and avoiding intentions could be well explained by the different acceptance dimensions. • Sabotage intentions could be less well explained by the different acceptance dimensions. Acceptance is vital for the successful integration of automated vehicles (AVs) into urban traffic. This is not only true for potential users of such vehicles. Other road users’ perceptions and actions are just as important when designing AVs. Previous research has primarily focused on pedestrians’ direct interactions with AVs (e.g., willingness to cross). However, there are other ways in which pedestrians might react to the presence of AVs. In the worst case, they avoid participating in urban traffic or obstruct AVs. To address this issue, this study surveyed N = 1,995 residents of Munich, Germany, to assess their perceptions of the potential integration of AVs and their expected behavior in urban traffic. The survey was structured around four dimensions: direct interactions with AVs (Pedestrian-AV Interaction), perceptions of the general future behavior of AVs towards pedestrians (Traffic Climate), the broader impact on urban traffic (Societal Factors) and Demographic and Individual Factors. Acceptance was measured by general attitudes toward AVs in urban traffic and their intention to cross, avoid and sabotage AVs. The results showed that attitudes and behavioral intentions could be accurately predicted across these four dimensions, except for sabotage intentions. Expectations regarding direct interactions with AVs emerged as the most important aspect, although perceptions of the general future behavior of AVs and broader impacts on urban traffic also influenced behavioral intentions and attitudes. The findings underscore the importance of exploring pedestrian acceptance beyond mere willingness to cross to ensure a comprehensive understanding of pedestrian attitudes toward AVs in urban traffic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101416
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance towards automated vehicles in urban traffic: A survey of pedestrian’s attitudes and behavioral intentions

Tibor Petzoldt, Kevin Harkin, A. Marie Harkin, Madlen Ringhand et al.
2 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
2.21
article

Acceptance towards automated vehicles in urban traffic: A survey of pedestrian’s attitudes and behavioral intentions

Tibor Petzoldt, Kevin Harkin, A. Marie Harkin, Madlen Ringhand, Katharina Kummerer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Pedestrian acceptance towards AVs in urban traffic was studied. • Key acceptance dimensions: AV Interaction, Traffic Climate, and Individual & Sociodemographic Factors. • Attitudes, crossing, and avoiding intentions could be well explained by the different acceptance dimensions. • Sabotage intentions could be less well explained by the different acceptance dimensions. Acceptance is vital for the successful integration of automated vehicles (AVs) into urban traffic. This is not only true for potential users of such vehicles. Other road users’ perceptions and actions are just as important when designing AVs. Previous research has primarily focused on pedestrians’ direct interactions with AVs (e.g., willingness to cross). However, there are other ways in which pedestrians might react to the presence of AVs. In the worst case, they avoid participating in urban traffic or obstruct AVs. To address this issue, this study surveyed N = 1,995 residents of Munich, Germany, to assess their perceptions of the potential integration of AVs and their expected behavior in urban traffic. The survey was structured around four dimensions: direct interactions with AVs (Pedestrian-AV Interaction), perceptions of the general future behavior of AVs towards pedestrians (Traffic Climate), the broader impact on urban traffic (Societal Factors) and Demographic and Individual Factors. Acceptance was measured by general attitudes toward AVs in urban traffic and their intention to cross, avoid and sabotage AVs. The results showed that attitudes and behavioral intentions could be accurately predicted across these four dimensions, except for sabotage intentions. Expectations regarding direct interactions with AVs emerged as the most important aspect, although perceptions of the general future behavior of AVs and broader impacts on urban traffic also influenced behavioral intentions and attitudes. The findings underscore the importance of exploring pedestrian acceptance beyond mere willingness to cross to ensure a comprehensive understanding of pedestrian attitudes toward AVs in urban traffic.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 31
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.