AMO‐Enhancing HRMPs and Employee Well‐Being Dimensions: A Three‐Level Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Human resource management practices (HRMPs) have inconsistent impacts on employee well‐being. However, prior research has not reached compelling conclusions due to variations in research designs (e.g., samples from various countries, different operationalizations of well‐being and HRMPs). To address this research gap, we conducted a three‐level meta‐analysis to explore the relationships between HRMPs and employee well‐being based on conservation of resources theory and the ability–motivation–opportunity model. HRMPs were categorized into AMO‐enhancing sub‐bundles, and employee well‐being was classified into psychological, health, and social well‐being. Using data from 69 studies ( N = 343,473), our findings revealed that ability‐enhancing HRMPs have the strongest association with health well‐being, motivation‐enhancing HRMPs with psychological well‐being, and opportunity‐enhancing HRMPs with social well‐being. These HRMPs–employee well‐being relationships vary by national culture, such as individualism and performance orientation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AMO‐Enhancing HRMPs and Employee Well‐Being Dimensions: A Three‐Level Meta‐Analysis

Shenyang Hai, Dan Zhao, Ningyu Tang, Vivien K. G. Lim
1 citations
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
article

AMO‐Enhancing HRMPs and Employee Well‐Being Dimensions: A Three‐Level Meta‐Analysis

Shenyang Hai, Dan Zhao, Ningyu Tang, Vivien K. G. Lim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Human resource management practices (HRMPs) have inconsistent impacts on employee well‐being. However, prior research has not reached compelling conclusions due to variations in research designs (e.g., samples from various countries, different operationalizations of well‐being and HRMPs). To address this research gap, we conducted a three‐level meta‐analysis to explore the relationships between HRMPs and employee well‐being based on conservation of resources theory and the ability–motivation–opportunity model. HRMPs were categorized into AMO‐enhancing sub‐bundles, and employee well‐being was classified into psychological, health, and social well‐being. Using data from 69 studies ( N = 343,473), our findings revealed that ability‐enhancing HRMPs have the strongest association with health well‐being, motivation‐enhancing HRMPs with psychological well‐being, and opportunity‐enhancing HRMPs with social well‐being. These HRMPs–employee well‐being relationships vary by national culture, such as individualism and performance orientation.

Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesVol. 63(2)
National University of Singapore (SG), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Hainan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.