The Divine Allegorist

In Barn. 2.6, the new νόμος of our Lord Jesus Christ is best understood as Christian allegorical exegesis of the Torah – accessed, according to the author, through Christian perception, gnosis, and insight, regarded as a divine gift (Barn. 1.2). This exegetical strategy usurps all other forms of theological reflection and provides a divine, eternal, and secure salvific understanding of who God is and what God requires. It also rescues ethical mandates of the law from Pauls apparent blanket rejections (e. g., Gal 3:10–14, 23–26). Aspects of this new law correspond in part to the social justice message of the Jewish prophets, suggesting that (according to Barnabas) past prophets accessed some aspects of the interpretations traceable to this strategy perhaps through spiritual inspiration, a focus on the intention of the laws, on ethics rather than cultus, or a combination of the three. To the extent that others – both Jews and Christians – do not interpret the scriptures in this way, their νόμος (3.6) falls perilously short. Since both Jews and Christians are targets of the critique, it may be necessary to rethink the nature of Barnabas as exemplifying Adversus Judaeos literature.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Religion in the Roman Empire
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1628/rre-2025-0006
Primary Topic
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Divine Allegorist

Clare K. Rothschild
Religion in the Roman Empire
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
article

The Divine Allegorist

Clare K. Rothschild
article en

Abstract

In Barn. 2.6, the new νόμος of our Lord Jesus Christ is best understood as Christian allegorical exegesis of the Torah – accessed, according to the author, through Christian perception, gnosis, and insight, regarded as a divine gift (Barn. 1.2). This exegetical strategy usurps all other forms of theological reflection and provides a divine, eternal, and secure salvific understanding of who God is and what God requires. It also rescues ethical mandates of the law from Pauls apparent blanket rejections (e. g., Gal 3:10–14, 23–26). Aspects of this new law correspond in part to the social justice message of the Jewish prophets, suggesting that (according to Barnabas) past prophets accessed some aspects of the interpretations traceable to this strategy perhaps through spiritual inspiration, a focus on the intention of the laws, on ethics rather than cultus, or a combination of the three. To the extent that others – both Jews and Christians – do not interpret the scriptures in this way, their νόμος (3.6) falls perilously short. Since both Jews and Christians are targets of the critique, it may be necessary to rethink the nature of Barnabas as exemplifying Adversus Judaeos literature.

Religion in the Roman EmpireVol. 11(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Divine Allegorist — Clare K. Rothschild · Religion in the Roman Empire (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS