What and Who Are “Essential”? A Disability Justice Perspective on COVID-19 Measures and the Diverse Disability Communities in Ontario

Central to Ontario’s COVID-19 response was defining, supporting, and protecting essential services and, by extension, essential people – often through decision-making processes that were ad hoc and lacking in meaningful public engagement. This paper examines the Ontario government’s public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, from the early steps taken in 2020 by provincial officials to develop a triage protocol for hospitals that would discriminate against those who fall outside of the narrow view of essential people – especially disabled and older people – to the implementation of public health measures that also disadvantaged diverse disability communities in a multitude of settings and far-reaching, multiple, and intersecting ways. Selectively drawing on online local and national newspapers across Canada that mentioned COVID-19 and people with disabilities from March 2020 to June 2020, we examined the ways in which disabled people have been rendered invisible, invaluable, disposable, and “non-essential” as they struggle to survive the pandemic largely outside of provincial COVID-19 response frameworks. Through this analysis, we craft a contrasting understanding of “essential” that attends to the principles of disability justice, shifting interdependencies, and the diversity and mutuality of human needs. Drawing on examples of mutual aid and caregiving in diverse disabled communities, we also explore disability justice as an alternative framework that leaves no one behind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Social Justice
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v19i1.4099
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What and Who Are “Essential”? A Disability Justice Perspective on COVID-19 Measures and the Diverse Disability Communities in Ontario

Jheanelle Anderson, Wendy Porch, Ann Fudge Schormans, Mary Jean Hande et al.
3 citations
Studies in Social Justice
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
6.07
article

What and Who Are “Essential”? A Disability Justice Perspective on COVID-19 Measures and the Diverse Disability Communities in Ontario

Jheanelle Anderson, Wendy Porch, Ann Fudge Schormans, Mary Jean Hande, Karen Yoshida, Susan Mahipaul, Chavon Ann Niles
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Central to Ontario’s COVID-19 response was defining, supporting, and protecting essential services and, by extension, essential people – often through decision-making processes that were ad hoc and lacking in meaningful public engagement. This paper examines the Ontario government’s public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, from the early steps taken in 2020 by provincial officials to develop a triage protocol for hospitals that would discriminate against those who fall outside of the narrow view of essential people – especially disabled and older people – to the implementation of public health measures that also disadvantaged diverse disability communities in a multitude of settings and far-reaching, multiple, and intersecting ways. Selectively drawing on online local and national newspapers across Canada that mentioned COVID-19 and people with disabilities from March 2020 to June 2020, we examined the ways in which disabled people have been rendered invisible, invaluable, disposable, and “non-essential” as they struggle to survive the pandemic largely outside of provincial COVID-19 response frameworks. Through this analysis, we craft a contrasting understanding of “essential” that attends to the principles of disability justice, shifting interdependencies, and the diversity and mutuality of human needs. Drawing on examples of mutual aid and caregiving in diverse disabled communities, we also explore disability justice as an alternative framework that leaves no one behind.

Studies in Social JusticeVol. 19(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Center for Independent Living (US), Trent University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.