Understanding preservation time thresholds in the modern era of heart transplantation

A 4-h preservation time threshold for cardiac allografts is the current standard in heart transplantation, but novel technologies are proposed to decrease the morbidity associated with prolonged allograft storage. This study examined adult heart transplant recipients from 2000-2015 and 2020-2023 in the United States, stratified into an early (2000-2015) and modern era (2020-2023), then into standard (≤ 4 h) and prolonged (≥ 5 h) preservation time groups within each era. This study reinforced the 4-h threshold in the early era, where prolonged preservation significantly increased one-year mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.90). However, this association was no longer significant in the modern era (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.85-1.50). A sub-analysis showed that using machine perfusion devices for allograft storage was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.70). Spline analysis demonstrated possible inflection points between 4 and 5 h and 8-9 h in the modern era, and further analysis found that 5-8 h of preservation did not increase one-year mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) relative to the ≤ 4 h group. In conclusion, the association between cardiac allograft preservation duration and morbidity has decreased in the modern era. Today, a 4-h preservation duration threshold may be too restrictive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96544-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding preservation time thresholds in the modern era of heart transplantation

Chetan Pasrija, Jessica Blair Briscoe, Antonio Polanco, Kavita Sharma et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
2.01
article

Understanding preservation time thresholds in the modern era of heart transplantation

Chetan Pasrija, Jessica Blair Briscoe, Antonio Polanco, Kavita Sharma, James S. Gammie, Corbin E. Goerlich, Rachael W. Quinn, Daniel Kyrillos Ragheb, Ahmet Kılıç, Ashish S. Shah, Chen Chia Wang, Shivani Shirodkar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A 4-h preservation time threshold for cardiac allografts is the current standard in heart transplantation, but novel technologies are proposed to decrease the morbidity associated with prolonged allograft storage. This study examined adult heart transplant recipients from 2000-2015 and 2020-2023 in the United States, stratified into an early (2000-2015) and modern era (2020-2023), then into standard (≤ 4 h) and prolonged (≥ 5 h) preservation time groups within each era. This study reinforced the 4-h threshold in the early era, where prolonged preservation significantly increased one-year mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.90). However, this association was no longer significant in the modern era (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.85-1.50). A sub-analysis showed that using machine perfusion devices for allograft storage was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.70). Spline analysis demonstrated possible inflection points between 4 and 5 h and 8-9 h in the modern era, and further analysis found that 5-8 h of preservation did not increase one-year mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) relative to the ≤ 4 h group. In conclusion, the association between cardiac allograft preservation duration and morbidity has decreased in the modern era. Today, a 4-h preservation duration threshold may be too restrictive.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.