Knee isokinetic strength benchmarks in athletes across sports categories and performance levels

This study aimed to compare the isokinetic strength metrics (relative peak torque, hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio, and bilateral asymmetry) between male and female athletes and performance levels (National and International) across sports categories (Endurance, Power, Skill, Combat, and Team). Secondly, this study presents reference values for knee isokinetic strength assessments for athletes from different sports. This cross-sectional study evaluated the knee isokinetic peak torque (PT) at 60<sup>o</sup> · s<sup>-1</sup> in 355 athletes (182 women, age 24.2 ± 6.6 years, 173 men, age 24.3 ± 9.1 years) from 24 different Olympic sports. Two-way ANOVA and eta-square effect size were used to compare sex and performance levels across sports categories. Consistently higher mean PT values were observed for all isokinetic variables in males than in females (Extension: 15%, Flexion: 7%). Higher PT values were found among male and female athletes in Combat (Extension: 12%, Flexion: 18%, (p < 0.05) and Power (Extension: 11%, Flexion: 7%) (p < 0.05), respectively. No differences were found between performance levels for all isokinetic strength metrics (p = 0.10 to 0.98). H/Q ratio and bilateral asymmetry were not meaningfully affected by either sex or performance levels. In conclusion, male athletes demonstrated higher PT values than females, regardless of sports categories, suggesting PT benchmarks should be used across sports categories but not performance levels for male and female athletes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology of Sport
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2025.148534
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knee isokinetic strength benchmarks in athletes across sports categories and performance levels

Elias C Figueroa, Brooke Butterick, Jason Siegler, Raúl Freire et al.
Biology of Sport
Sports Performance and Training
article

Knee isokinetic strength benchmarks in athletes across sports categories and performance levels

Elias C Figueroa, Brooke Butterick, Jason Siegler, Raúl Freire, Drake Huff
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the isokinetic strength metrics (relative peak torque, hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio, and bilateral asymmetry) between male and female athletes and performance levels (National and International) across sports categories (Endurance, Power, Skill, Combat, and Team). Secondly, this study presents reference values for knee isokinetic strength assessments for athletes from different sports. This cross-sectional study evaluated the knee isokinetic peak torque (PT) at 60<sup>o</sup> · s<sup>-1</sup> in 355 athletes (182 women, age 24.2 ± 6.6 years, 173 men, age 24.3 ± 9.1 years) from 24 different Olympic sports. Two-way ANOVA and eta-square effect size were used to compare sex and performance levels across sports categories. Consistently higher mean PT values were observed for all isokinetic variables in males than in females (Extension: 15%, Flexion: 7%). Higher PT values were found among male and female athletes in Combat (Extension: 12%, Flexion: 18%, (p < 0.05) and Power (Extension: 11%, Flexion: 7%) (p < 0.05), respectively. No differences were found between performance levels for all isokinetic strength metrics (p = 0.10 to 0.98). H/Q ratio and bilateral asymmetry were not meaningfully affected by either sex or performance levels. In conclusion, male athletes demonstrated higher PT values than females, regardless of sports categories, suggesting PT benchmarks should be used across sports categories but not performance levels for male and female athletes.

Biology of SportVol. 42(4)
Exos (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.