A Swinging Pendulum and Future Possibilities

Abstract This essay is the author’s response to a forum focused on The Secular Paradox: On the Religiosity of the Not Religious (Blankholm 2022), which was published in Secular Studies in December 2024. The essay has three parts. The first part summarizes The Secular Paradox as the author sees it today. It emphasizes the importance of taking the titular “paradox” seriously, as an ostensible contradiction rather than mere confusion. It also considers the persistent challenges we face when trying to study something paradoxical. Our language and concepts fail us, and The Secular Paradox diagnoses that failure. The second part summarizes the essays in the forum and engages with each of them to highlight their insights and draw attention to the important projects from which they’re drawn. The final part describes several future directions in the study of secularism, secularity, and secular people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Secular Studies
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-bja10089
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Swinging Pendulum and Future Possibilities

Joseph Blankholm
Secular Studies
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

A Swinging Pendulum and Future Possibilities

Joseph Blankholm
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay is the author’s response to a forum focused on The Secular Paradox: On the Religiosity of the Not Religious (Blankholm 2022), which was published in Secular Studies in December 2024. The essay has three parts. The first part summarizes The Secular Paradox as the author sees it today. It emphasizes the importance of taking the titular “paradox” seriously, as an ostensible contradiction rather than mere confusion. It also considers the persistent challenges we face when trying to study something paradoxical. Our language and concepts fail us, and The Secular Paradox diagnoses that failure. The second part summarizes the essays in the forum and engages with each of them to highlight their insights and draw attention to the important projects from which they’re drawn. The final part describes several future directions in the study of secularism, secularity, and secular people.

Secular StudiesVol. 7(1)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Swinging Pendulum and Future Possibilities — Joseph Blankholm · Secular Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS