Does improved environmental and disclosure performance payoff? Not for CA 100+ companies

Purpose This study examines the financial performance and cost of equity estimates of firms included in Climate Action 100+ (CA 100+), a group comprising the largest global industrial emitters. The research explores how decarbonization plans and climate-related disclosures influence the cost of equity, offering insights into the complex relationship between climate risk and financial outcomes. Design/methodology/approach We analyze the stock performance of CA 100+ firms from 2016 to 2022, comparing their returns to well-known global indices. Cost of equity estimates are calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Dividend Discount Model (DDM). The study adjusts for country and industry influences and evaluates the impact of CA 100+ benchmark scores and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) quality ratings on the cost of equity. Findings CA 100+ firms outperformed major global indices in both actual and risk-adjusted returns during the study period. These firms exhibited higher average returns with lower standard deviations, suggesting first-order stochastic dominance. The information ratio (IR) for the CA 100+ portfolio relative to benchmark indices was consistently large and positive, confirming superior risk-adjusted performance. After controlling for country and industry effects, cost of equity estimates for CA 100+ firms were virtually identical to those of a corresponding benchmark. Surprisingly, firms with lower CA 100+ scores and lower-quality TCFD disclosures had lower costs of equity than firms with superior performance, indicating that markets do not penalize poor environmental performance or disclosure quality. Originality/value This study challenges conventional assumptions that superior environmental performance correlates with lower cost of equity. The unexpected finding that poorly rated firms exhibit lower financing costs underscores the complexity of the relationship between environmental disclosure, decarbonization strategies and financial performance. The results provide essential insights for institutional investors, policymakers and corporate executives navigating the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Finance
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-10-2024-0762
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does improved environmental and disclosure performance payoff? Not for CA 100+ companies

Sean Cleary, Neal Willcott
2 citations
Managerial Finance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
article

Does improved environmental and disclosure performance payoff? Not for CA 100+ companies

Sean Cleary, Neal Willcott
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the financial performance and cost of equity estimates of firms included in Climate Action 100+ (CA 100+), a group comprising the largest global industrial emitters. The research explores how decarbonization plans and climate-related disclosures influence the cost of equity, offering insights into the complex relationship between climate risk and financial outcomes. Design/methodology/approach We analyze the stock performance of CA 100+ firms from 2016 to 2022, comparing their returns to well-known global indices. Cost of equity estimates are calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Dividend Discount Model (DDM). The study adjusts for country and industry influences and evaluates the impact of CA 100+ benchmark scores and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) quality ratings on the cost of equity. Findings CA 100+ firms outperformed major global indices in both actual and risk-adjusted returns during the study period. These firms exhibited higher average returns with lower standard deviations, suggesting first-order stochastic dominance. The information ratio (IR) for the CA 100+ portfolio relative to benchmark indices was consistently large and positive, confirming superior risk-adjusted performance. After controlling for country and industry effects, cost of equity estimates for CA 100+ firms were virtually identical to those of a corresponding benchmark. Surprisingly, firms with lower CA 100+ scores and lower-quality TCFD disclosures had lower costs of equity than firms with superior performance, indicating that markets do not penalize poor environmental performance or disclosure quality. Originality/value This study challenges conventional assumptions that superior environmental performance correlates with lower cost of equity. The unexpected finding that poorly rated firms exhibit lower financing costs underscores the complexity of the relationship between environmental disclosure, decarbonization strategies and financial performance. The results provide essential insights for institutional investors, policymakers and corporate executives navigating the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Managerial FinanceVol. 51(12)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.