Discounting extreme positions: party normalization and support for the far right

Abstract When are far right parties punished for their extreme positions? We argue that the punishments of deviant position-taking are conditional on the degree to which a far right party is normalized or stigmatized in the party system. When the far right is treated as normal, the costs suffered from these parties’ extreme positions decrease, as moderate voters discount the authenticity of their commitment to such positions. We use a survey experiment to test this argument in Spain, finding evidence for discounting on the far right’s extreme anti-LGBTQ+ statements, but not on its embrace of authoritarian history. This study thus shows that normalization and stigmatization of the far right can change how its extreme positions are interpreted by voters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.29
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discounting extreme positions: party normalization and support for the far right

Laia Balcells, Sergi Martínez, Ethan vanderWilden
2 citations
Political Science Research and Methods
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
17.04
article

Discounting extreme positions: party normalization and support for the far right

Laia Balcells, Sergi Martínez, Ethan vanderWilden
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract When are far right parties punished for their extreme positions? We argue that the punishments of deviant position-taking are conditional on the degree to which a far right party is normalized or stigmatized in the party system. When the far right is treated as normal, the costs suffered from these parties’ extreme positions decrease, as moderate voters discount the authenticity of their commitment to such positions. We use a survey experiment to test this argument in Spain, finding evidence for discounting on the far right’s extreme anti-LGBTQ+ statements, but not on its embrace of authoritarian history. This study thus shows that normalization and stigmatization of the far right can change how its extreme positions are interpreted by voters.

Political Science Research and MethodsVol. 14(2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Georgetown University (US), Universidad EAFIT (CO)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discounting extreme positions: party normalization and support for the far right — Laia Balcells, Sergi Martínez, et al. · Political Science Research and Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS