Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Post-Training Enhancement to the LifeKeepers Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training

<b></b> <i>Background</i>: Gatekeeper training (GKT) programs improve knowledge and self-efficacy in suicide prevention, but the sustainability of these improvements is uncertain. While booster sessions are suggested to enhance retention, existing research is inconclusive. <i>Aim:</i> This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of booster sessions in the LifeKeepers GKT program for maintaining long-term knowledge and self-efficacy at 6 months post-training. <i>Method:</i> A total of 1,732 participants who had completed LifeKeepers GKT were randomly assigned to one of three trial groups, an intervention (booster), control (training as usual), or attention control group. Participants completed measures of knowledge and self-efficacy at 3, 6, and 12 months and reported their frequency of interventions and referrals at 3 and 6 months. <i>Results:</i> No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of knowledge retention, self-efficacy, or behavior change at any follow-up point. However, sustained improvements were observed across all groups. <i>Limitations</i>: Ceiling effects and attrition may have influenced the findings. <i>Conclusion:</i> Booster sessions did not significantly enhance knowledge, self-efficacy, or behavior outcomes. All groups demonstrated sustained improvements, but ceiling effects and attrition caution against overinterpreting the findings. Further research is needed to explore effective strategies for long-term retention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crisis
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001001
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Post-Training Enhancement to the LifeKeepers Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training

Denise Kingi-Uluave, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick et al.
Crisis
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Post-Training Enhancement to the LifeKeepers Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training

Denise Kingi-Uluave, Tania Cargo, Karolina Stasiak, Sarah Hetrick, Chris Framptom
article en

Abstract

<b></b> <i>Background</i>: Gatekeeper training (GKT) programs improve knowledge and self-efficacy in suicide prevention, but the sustainability of these improvements is uncertain. While booster sessions are suggested to enhance retention, existing research is inconclusive. <i>Aim:</i> This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of booster sessions in the LifeKeepers GKT program for maintaining long-term knowledge and self-efficacy at 6 months post-training. <i>Method:</i> A total of 1,732 participants who had completed LifeKeepers GKT were randomly assigned to one of three trial groups, an intervention (booster), control (training as usual), or attention control group. Participants completed measures of knowledge and self-efficacy at 3, 6, and 12 months and reported their frequency of interventions and referrals at 3 and 6 months. <i>Results:</i> No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of knowledge retention, self-efficacy, or behavior change at any follow-up point. However, sustained improvements were observed across all groups. <i>Limitations</i>: Ceiling effects and attrition may have influenced the findings. <i>Conclusion:</i> Booster sessions did not significantly enhance knowledge, self-efficacy, or behavior outcomes. All groups demonstrated sustained improvements, but ceiling effects and attrition caution against overinterpreting the findings. Further research is needed to explore effective strategies for long-term retention.

CrisisVol. 46(3)
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.