Generating positive self-descriptions in a research context: a discursive psychological and conversation analysis of interview products and practices

Interview research has been criticised because analysts often focus on interviewees’ talk and overlook the interviewer’s role in its production. This study uses conversation (CA) and discursive psychological (DP) analysis to examine interviews with Syrian and UK participants. It asks what conclusions can be drawn about their positive self-descriptions when analysis attends simultaneously to the sequences of turns and practices within and through which they are generated. The analysis identifies four discursive strategies used to manage inferential difficulties of self-praise: shifting to subject-side assessments; formulating a ‘licence to tell’; using third-party reports; and warranting claims. It also shows how self-descriptions were co-produced through question reformulation, continuers and closing sequences. Comparison with studies of spontaneous self-praise shows how modesty is a common concern which is addressed strategically using shared and distinct discursive resources. The paper concludes that the approach developed here can address a key challenge of using interviews for research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2025.2489475
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating positive self-descriptions in a research context: a discursive psychological and conversation analysis of interview products and practices

Sue Widdicombe
2 citations
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
20.85
article

Generating positive self-descriptions in a research context: a discursive psychological and conversation analysis of interview products and practices

Sue Widdicombe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Interview research has been criticised because analysts often focus on interviewees’ talk and overlook the interviewer’s role in its production. This study uses conversation (CA) and discursive psychological (DP) analysis to examine interviews with Syrian and UK participants. It asks what conclusions can be drawn about their positive self-descriptions when analysis attends simultaneously to the sequences of turns and practices within and through which they are generated. The analysis identifies four discursive strategies used to manage inferential difficulties of self-praise: shifting to subject-side assessments; formulating a ‘licence to tell’; using third-party reports; and warranting claims. It also shows how self-descriptions were co-produced through question reformulation, continuers and closing sequences. Comparison with studies of spontaneous self-praise shows how modesty is a common concern which is addressed strategically using shared and distinct discursive resources. The paper concludes that the approach developed here can address a key challenge of using interviews for research.

Qualitative Research in PsychologyVol. 22(4)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
20.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generating positive self-descriptions in a research context: a discursive psychological and conversation analysis of interview products and practices — Sue Widdicombe · Qualitative Research in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS