Rethinking Gender/Sex Identity
Until quite recently, investigations of gender/sex development operated from a baseline assumption that gender/sex is dichotomous or binary. Most such studies constructed gender/sex outside of or adjacent to specific cultures, and for the most part studied children from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD) countries. In this paper I first advocate for four research guidelines-inclusivity, epistemic justice, materiality, and empiricism. I sketch out the historical background that still shapes contemporary studies into the psychology of gender/sex identity in infants and toddlers. Next, I point toward methods for the study of gender/sex in infants and toddlers that have the potential to make nonbinary development visible and to develop culturally diverse concepts of identity development. Finally, I challenge psychologists and others to view and operationalize the study of identity as a relational, phenomenological entity rather than a fixed feature of the individual psyche.
Authors
- Anne Fausto‐Sterling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2240-639X)
Institutions
- Brown University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Human Biology
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.70044
- Citations
- 11
- Primary Topic
- Early Childhood Education and Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 98.19
Funders
- Arizona State University
- University of Northern British Columbia
- McMaster University