Time, Space, and Their Meanings

The events meanings that are locked in time and space appear in evolution process as historical descriptions. Nevertheless, the interpretation of meanings by the theories of international relations involves limitations that highlight either historical themes (security, political interest, and realpolitik) or episodic meanings (history, economy, and philosophy). The difficulty in establishing an interpretative background for meaning description consists in identifying the convergence between historical understanding and how to explain the continuity in the context of the present. The classical paradigms neglected the potential modes of localization in time and space that were possibly subversive. In opposition, post-structuralism emphasizes the continuity of meanings in the logic of international structuration in a way that transcends the self and the own identity through cultural dimensions. Due to that, the theories recognize that between structuration and transformation, there is localization of the meanings and historical perspective over bifurcation moments. According with the present complexity, the theories of international relations needs refashioning into a tool of this information interpretation and his philosophical sense. We dare to develop a deconstruction framework and seek to establish it in philosophical interpretation of international reality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anuarul Institutului de Istorie George Bariţiu Series Historica
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59277/aiigb/2024.63.19
Primary Topic
Historical Geography and Cartography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time, Space, and Their Meanings

Tudor Salanţiu
Anuarul Institutului de Istorie George Bariţiu Series Historica
Historical Geography and Cartography
article

Time, Space, and Their Meanings

Tudor Salanţiu
article en

Abstract

The events meanings that are locked in time and space appear in evolution process as historical descriptions. Nevertheless, the interpretation of meanings by the theories of international relations involves limitations that highlight either historical themes (security, political interest, and realpolitik) or episodic meanings (history, economy, and philosophy). The difficulty in establishing an interpretative background for meaning description consists in identifying the convergence between historical understanding and how to explain the continuity in the context of the present. The classical paradigms neglected the potential modes of localization in time and space that were possibly subversive. In opposition, post-structuralism emphasizes the continuity of meanings in the logic of international structuration in a way that transcends the self and the own identity through cultural dimensions. Due to that, the theories recognize that between structuration and transformation, there is localization of the meanings and historical perspective over bifurcation moments. According with the present complexity, the theories of international relations needs refashioning into a tool of this information interpretation and his philosophical sense. We dare to develop a deconstruction framework and seek to establish it in philosophical interpretation of international reality.

Anuarul Institutului de Istorie George Bariţiu Series HistoricaVol. 63
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Historical Geography and Cartography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.