Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of zinc titanium and aluminum doped copper oxide nanoparticles produced under the same conditions

Abstract The antibacterial nanoparticles have technological uses in many areas, from wall paint to clothing, from medicine to agriculture. Such copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles can be easily produced by the sol–gel method. In this study, primarily pure CuO and CuO nanoparticles doped with 4%, 8%, 12%, and 16% zinc, titanium, and aluminum were produced by the sol–gel method. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and x‐ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of all produced nanoparticles were performed. The dimensions of pure CuO nanoparticles are approximately 50 nm, while the doped nanoparticles are approximately 80 nm. Bacterial cultivation was carried out using the nanoparticles that had been converted into tablets, with Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens as the test microorganisms. When disc diffusion test results were evaluated, it was generally observed that doping increased the antibacterial effect compared to pure CuO. The additives providing the antibacterial effect for E. coli caused the inhibition zones to grow at an average rate of Al (27%), Zn (15%), and TiO (6%), respectively. In A. tumefaciens bacteria, an increase was observed in the antibacterial effect inhibition zones with Al and Zn additives, while a decrease was observed with TiO additives. As a result, it was seen that CuO doping increased the antibacterial effect, and the best effect was Al doping. When all data were evaluated, the highest antibacterial effect was achieved with 8% Aluminum additive, resulting in a 34% increase in the inhibition diameter for E. coli and a 37% increase for A. tumefaciens .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.70016
Primary Topic
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of zinc titanium and aluminum doped copper oxide nanoparticles produced under the same conditions

Serkan Aykut, M. Kıyami Erdіm, Çiğdem Oruç, A. Çelik Bozdoğan et al.
Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
article

Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of zinc titanium and aluminum doped copper oxide nanoparticles produced under the same conditions

Serkan Aykut, M. Kıyami Erdіm, Çiğdem Oruç, A. Çelik Bozdoğan, Günseli Kurt-Gür, Mustafa Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

Abstract The antibacterial nanoparticles have technological uses in many areas, from wall paint to clothing, from medicine to agriculture. Such copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles can be easily produced by the sol–gel method. In this study, primarily pure CuO and CuO nanoparticles doped with 4%, 8%, 12%, and 16% zinc, titanium, and aluminum were produced by the sol–gel method. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and x‐ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of all produced nanoparticles were performed. The dimensions of pure CuO nanoparticles are approximately 50 nm, while the doped nanoparticles are approximately 80 nm. Bacterial cultivation was carried out using the nanoparticles that had been converted into tablets, with Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens as the test microorganisms. When disc diffusion test results were evaluated, it was generally observed that doping increased the antibacterial effect compared to pure CuO. The additives providing the antibacterial effect for E. coli caused the inhibition zones to grow at an average rate of Al (27%), Zn (15%), and TiO (6%), respectively. In A. tumefaciens bacteria, an increase was observed in the antibacterial effect inhibition zones with Al and Zn additives, while a decrease was observed with TiO additives. As a result, it was seen that CuO doping increased the antibacterial effect, and the best effect was Al doping. When all data were evaluated, the highest antibacterial effect was achieved with 8% Aluminum additive, resulting in a 34% increase in the inhibition diameter for E. coli and a 37% increase for A. tumefaciens .

Journal of the Chinese Chemical SocietyVol. 72(5)
Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.