Contours of Alternative Development: A Systematic Literature Review

Alternative development (AD) emerged in the 1970s as a transformative development framework that challenged traditional growth models while prioritized people, sustainability, and grassroots participation. In these five decades, a multiple faces of alternative development emerged demonstrating shifts in its themes and agendas. Sometimes its voices coopted to mainstream development, some other times posturing itself as the mainstream. A considerable studies examined the evolution of AD, however, there is still a limited systematic understanding of its conceptualization, methodologies, and practices. This paper attempts to track the trajectory of AD before and after 2008 through systematic review of literature. The demarcation point 2008 means that due to global financial crisis global as well as national development paradigms shifted tremendously in this era. Therefore, a comparison of alternative development themes before and after 2008 could provide a general frame of analysis. A systematic literature review method was applied to investigate the evolution of AD, concentrating its shifts on conceptual, methodological, and programmatic aspects. The review adhered to strict protocols, including screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, to ensure methodological rigor and reliability. Peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, and conference proceedings from 1970 to 2024 were analyzed to capture both historical and contemporary perspectives on AD. The findings indicate a notable shift in the field of AD, moving from grassroots models that prioritized equity and sustainability to more globally integrated frameworks that align with initiatives like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Before 2008, AD was marked by critiques of economic growth models, focusing on local empowerment and ecological balance. After 2008, AD has broadened its scope to tackle global issues such as climate resilience, technological innovation, and participatory governance, all while upholding its fundamental principles of inclusivity and sustainability. By merging historical and contemporary viewpoints, this study offers important insights into the development trajectory of AD and its significance in confronting modern issues like climate change, inequality, and resource depletion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NUTA Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/nutaj.v11i1-2.77021
Primary Topic
Community and Sustainable Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contours of Alternative Development: A Systematic Literature Review

Ratna Mani Nepal, Rudra Prasad Bhattarai
NUTA Journal
Community and Sustainable Development
article

Contours of Alternative Development: A Systematic Literature Review

Ratna Mani Nepal, Rudra Prasad Bhattarai
article en

Abstract

Alternative development (AD) emerged in the 1970s as a transformative development framework that challenged traditional growth models while prioritized people, sustainability, and grassroots participation. In these five decades, a multiple faces of alternative development emerged demonstrating shifts in its themes and agendas. Sometimes its voices coopted to mainstream development, some other times posturing itself as the mainstream. A considerable studies examined the evolution of AD, however, there is still a limited systematic understanding of its conceptualization, methodologies, and practices. This paper attempts to track the trajectory of AD before and after 2008 through systematic review of literature. The demarcation point 2008 means that due to global financial crisis global as well as national development paradigms shifted tremendously in this era. Therefore, a comparison of alternative development themes before and after 2008 could provide a general frame of analysis. A systematic literature review method was applied to investigate the evolution of AD, concentrating its shifts on conceptual, methodological, and programmatic aspects. The review adhered to strict protocols, including screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, to ensure methodological rigor and reliability. Peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, and conference proceedings from 1970 to 2024 were analyzed to capture both historical and contemporary perspectives on AD. The findings indicate a notable shift in the field of AD, moving from grassroots models that prioritized equity and sustainability to more globally integrated frameworks that align with initiatives like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Before 2008, AD was marked by critiques of economic growth models, focusing on local empowerment and ecological balance. After 2008, AD has broadened its scope to tackle global issues such as climate resilience, technological innovation, and participatory governance, all while upholding its fundamental principles of inclusivity and sustainability. By merging historical and contemporary viewpoints, this study offers important insights into the development trajectory of AD and its significance in confronting modern issues like climate change, inequality, and resource depletion.

NUTA JournalVol. 11(1-2)
Tribhuvan University (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Community and Sustainable Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.