Cultură și memorie (II). Deschidere heideggeriană a reflecției despre canonul cultural. Concluziile demersului fenomenologic și hermeneutic asupra canonului cultural ca memorie

This study aims to develop specific premises for a theory belonging to the cultural canon. After an edifying Bergsonian approach and after a necessary turn in Augustine’s theory on memory, published in the previous edition of this publication, we shall try to specify our reflection by the Heideggarian hermeneutics, regarding its main result being the decisive relation between the destiny and the temporal/historical Dasein’s constitution. Ultimately, we will offer a personal reflection on the cultural canon, based on the previous phenomenological and hermeneutical inquiries. The most important conclusions refer to the mediating role of the canon between the faculties of the Subject, the dynamics of the canon system, a possible pedagogy of the canon, and the structuring function of the canon as a compensation for the deconstructive function of the present. The Augustinian equivalence „animus sive memoria” could be considered the equational summary of the whole approach below.

Publication Details

Journal
Studii de epistemologie şi teorie a valorilor.
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59277/setv.2024.10.06
Primary Topic
Religious Tourism and Spaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultură și memorie (II). Deschidere heideggeriană a reflecției despre canonul cultural. Concluziile demersului fenomenologic și hermeneutic asupra canonului cultural ca memorie

Studii de epistemologie şi teorie a valorilor.
Religious Tourism and Spaces
article

Cultură și memorie (II). Deschidere heideggeriană a reflecției despre canonul cultural. Concluziile demersului fenomenologic și hermeneutic asupra canonului cultural ca memorie

article en

Abstract

This study aims to develop specific premises for a theory belonging to the cultural canon. After an edifying Bergsonian approach and after a necessary turn in Augustine’s theory on memory, published in the previous edition of this publication, we shall try to specify our reflection by the Heideggarian hermeneutics, regarding its main result being the decisive relation between the destiny and the temporal/historical Dasein’s constitution. Ultimately, we will offer a personal reflection on the cultural canon, based on the previous phenomenological and hermeneutical inquiries. The most important conclusions refer to the mediating role of the canon between the faculties of the Subject, the dynamics of the canon system, a possible pedagogy of the canon, and the structuring function of the canon as a compensation for the deconstructive function of the present. The Augustinian equivalence „animus sive memoria” could be considered the equational summary of the whole approach below.

Studii de epistemologie şi teorie a valorilor.Vol. 10
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Religious Tourism and Spaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.