Comparison of Different Materials in the Same-Sized Cemented Stems on Periprosthetic Fractures in Bone Models

<b>Objective</b>: The increasing number of aging patients with total hip arthroplasties (THA) causes an increased incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PPF). The study aimed to evaluate the impacts of two different materials in the same-sized cemented stems on PPF in bone models. <b>Methods</b>: This study compared the maximum rotational torque leading to PPF when stems made of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy and stainless use steel (SUS) were implanted using simulated bone models (Sawbones, 3403). The maximum destruction torque was compared statistically for each material (Co-Cr-Mo alloy vs. SUS stainless steel) in this model, and fracture patterns were examined. <b>Results</b>: The PPF occurred with a spiral propagation from the proximal femur towards the diaphysis, with breakage occurring near the distal end of the stem. There were no significant differences in the destruction torque values between the Co-Cr-Mo alloy (103.0 ± 14.9 Nm) and SUS (98.7 ± 15.1 Nm) samples (<i>p</i> = 0.575). The fractures using the bone models exhibited similar patterns in all specimens, resembling clinical PPF fracture types clinically, specifically Vancouver classification B2. <b>Conclusions</b>: The comparison of the maximum destruction torques of the Co-Cr-Mo alloy and SUS cemented stems in simulating PPF showed no significant differences. The results suggest that the materials of the cemented stems might not significantly affect the occurrence of PPF in THA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082724
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Different Materials in the Same-Sized Cemented Stems on Periprosthetic Fractures in Bone Models

Nobunori Takahashi, Yukio Nakamura, Takkan Morishima, Kohei Hashimoto
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
article

Comparison of Different Materials in the Same-Sized Cemented Stems on Periprosthetic Fractures in Bone Models

Nobunori Takahashi, Yukio Nakamura, Takkan Morishima, Kohei Hashimoto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: The increasing number of aging patients with total hip arthroplasties (THA) causes an increased incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PPF). The study aimed to evaluate the impacts of two different materials in the same-sized cemented stems on PPF in bone models. <b>Methods</b>: This study compared the maximum rotational torque leading to PPF when stems made of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy and stainless use steel (SUS) were implanted using simulated bone models (Sawbones, 3403). The maximum destruction torque was compared statistically for each material (Co-Cr-Mo alloy vs. SUS stainless steel) in this model, and fracture patterns were examined. <b>Results</b>: The PPF occurred with a spiral propagation from the proximal femur towards the diaphysis, with breakage occurring near the distal end of the stem. There were no significant differences in the destruction torque values between the Co-Cr-Mo alloy (103.0 ± 14.9 Nm) and SUS (98.7 ± 15.1 Nm) samples (<i>p</i> = 0.575). The fractures using the bone models exhibited similar patterns in all specimens, resembling clinical PPF fracture types clinically, specifically Vancouver classification B2. <b>Conclusions</b>: The comparison of the maximum destruction torques of the Co-Cr-Mo alloy and SUS cemented stems in simulating PPF showed no significant differences. The results suggest that the materials of the cemented stems might not significantly affect the occurrence of PPF in THA.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
Aichi Medical University (JP)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.