Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions

Inequity aversion (IA) is the resistance to unequitable rewards given similar investments. It has been postulated as an important mechanism by which human cooperation thrives. To understand the evolutionary origin of human IA and its distribution across the animal kingdom, many species have been tested on IA, with mixed results. Whereas chimpanzees were originally found to show IA, more recent studies showed that their IA response could be explained by social disappointment. We conducted two studies on IA in bonobos using established paradigms: a token-exchange task and the social disappointment task. Bonobos could exchange tokens for equal or less-preferred food rewards than their partners (Study 1) and were tested with humans and machines to control for social disappointment effects (Study 2). We found that bonobos responded aversively to unequal food distributions in both studies, which was reflected by more refusals to participate when disadvantaged. Notably, and contrary to chimpanzees, this effect could not be explained by social disappointment, although Study 2 was only partially consistent with an IA explanation. Overall, our findings indicate that bonobos possess the sensitivity to recognize and respond to unfair treatment, which supports the notion that IA may have coevolved as a stabilizing mechanism for cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2873
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions

Daniel B. M. Haun, Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen, Josep Call, Kia Radovanović et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
article

Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions

Daniel B. M. Haun, Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen, Josep Call, Kia Radovanović, Juliane Bräuer, Sebastian Schütte, Anoek Lorskens
article en

Abstract

Inequity aversion (IA) is the resistance to unequitable rewards given similar investments. It has been postulated as an important mechanism by which human cooperation thrives. To understand the evolutionary origin of human IA and its distribution across the animal kingdom, many species have been tested on IA, with mixed results. Whereas chimpanzees were originally found to show IA, more recent studies showed that their IA response could be explained by social disappointment. We conducted two studies on IA in bonobos using established paradigms: a token-exchange task and the social disappointment task. Bonobos could exchange tokens for equal or less-preferred food rewards than their partners (Study 1) and were tested with humans and machines to control for social disappointment effects (Study 2). We found that bonobos responded aversively to unequal food distributions in both studies, which was reflected by more refusals to participate when disadvantaged. Notably, and contrary to chimpanzees, this effect could not be explained by social disappointment, although Study 2 was only partially consistent with an IA explanation. Overall, our findings indicate that bonobos possess the sensitivity to recognize and respond to unfair treatment, which supports the notion that IA may have coevolved as a stabilizing mechanism for cooperation.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 292(2045)
University of St Andrews (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
European Commission, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.