Olfactory performance explains duality of antennal architectural designs in Lepidoptera

Male attraction by females through sex pheromones is widespread among Lepidoptera, and antennae are key olfactory organs during male orientation. Broadly speaking, two designs of antennae coexist in Lepidoptera: complex (pectinate) or stick-like (filiform) ones. Pectinate antennae have attracted attention because of their multiscale geometry, assumed to outperform filiform. Yet, the filiform design is by far more common. We compare the olfactory performance of the two designs using modelling, particle image velocimetry on three-dimensional-printed scaled-up models and computational simulations. In terms of absolute odour capture, pectinate antennae perform better at nearly all flying speeds. However, when considering drag, filiform designs are more energy efficient than pectinate ones at low-flight speeds, while the reverse holds at high speeds. This is owing to the differential scaling of drag and molecule capture with flight speed. According to our results, small and slow moths would bear filiform antennae whereas big and fast moths would have pectinate ones, which is the general trend observed in nature. We discuss exceptions to this general pattern and how species could evolve from one design to the other by investigating the influence of the antennal structural elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2946
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect Pheromone Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Olfactory performance explains duality of antennal architectural designs in Lepidoptera

Thomas Steinmann, Mourad Jaffar‐Bandjee, Jérôme Casas, Thomas Engels et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Insect Pheromone Research and Control
1.67
article

Olfactory performance explains duality of antennal architectural designs in Lepidoptera

Thomas Steinmann, Mourad Jaffar‐Bandjee, Jérôme Casas, Thomas Engels, Gijs Krijnen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Male attraction by females through sex pheromones is widespread among Lepidoptera, and antennae are key olfactory organs during male orientation. Broadly speaking, two designs of antennae coexist in Lepidoptera: complex (pectinate) or stick-like (filiform) ones. Pectinate antennae have attracted attention because of their multiscale geometry, assumed to outperform filiform. Yet, the filiform design is by far more common. We compare the olfactory performance of the two designs using modelling, particle image velocimetry on three-dimensional-printed scaled-up models and computational simulations. In terms of absolute odour capture, pectinate antennae perform better at nearly all flying speeds. However, when considering drag, filiform designs are more energy efficient than pectinate ones at low-flight speeds, while the reverse holds at high speeds. This is owing to the differential scaling of drag and molecule capture with flight speed. According to our results, small and slow moths would bear filiform antennae whereas big and fast moths would have pectinate ones, which is the general trend observed in nature. We discuss exceptions to this general pattern and how species could evolve from one design to the other by investigating the influence of the antennal structural elements.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 292(2045)
Université de Tours (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE), Institut des Sciences du Mouvement Etienne-Jules Marey (FR), Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte UMR 7261 (FR), University of Twente (NL)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Insect Pheromone Research and Control
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.