Understanding Management Accounting Research from Laughlin’s (1985) Lens

As a closed neighboring discipline of accounting, should Management Accounting (MA) be viewed as social practice or merely as a technical knowledge or both? Such question has been greatly debated among academia and practitioners. There has been a great diverse ‘battle’ or disagreement among positivists, interpretivist and criticalist in terms of which is the most appropriate paradigm to be followed has been greatly debated from the perspectives of epistemology and ontology. By answering this question, it may contribute a greater insight to the theoretical and practical perspectives of Management Accounting research. This paper adopts Laughlin’s Middle Range perspective to harmonise the debate between different schools of thoughts in accounting research. This paper aims to explore the understanding of management accounting from a broader perspective which incorporates technical and social practices together. It also intends to offer an insight into mixed research approach which is adopted in accounting research. Lastly, this paper offers a view of the future challenges ahead of accounting researchers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.914mg0054
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Management Accounting Research from Laughlin’s (1985) Lens

Mui Yee Cheok
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Understanding Management Accounting Research from Laughlin’s (1985) Lens

Mui Yee Cheok
article en

Abstract

As a closed neighboring discipline of accounting, should Management Accounting (MA) be viewed as social practice or merely as a technical knowledge or both? Such question has been greatly debated among academia and practitioners. There has been a great diverse ‘battle’ or disagreement among positivists, interpretivist and criticalist in terms of which is the most appropriate paradigm to be followed has been greatly debated from the perspectives of epistemology and ontology. By answering this question, it may contribute a greater insight to the theoretical and practical perspectives of Management Accounting research. This paper adopts Laughlin’s Middle Range perspective to harmonise the debate between different schools of thoughts in accounting research. This paper aims to explore the understanding of management accounting from a broader perspective which incorporates technical and social practices together. It also intends to offer an insight into mixed research approach which is adopted in accounting research. Lastly, this paper offers a view of the future challenges ahead of accounting researchers.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(XIV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.