Transforming Education Policy: From National Assessment to National Exam and Its Impact on Learning Quality in Indonesia

Education policy in Indonesia has undergone a significant shift from the National Assessment (AN) back to the National Examination (UN). This transition reflects concerns about infrastructure readiness, assessment effectiveness, and policy continuity. Using a qualitative approach, this study compares AN and UN, evaluating their implications for learning quality, equity, and systemic readiness. The findings highlight that while AN promotes holistic education by assessing literacy, numeracy, and character development, its implementation is hindered by technological and resource disparities. Conversely, the UN provides clear benchmarks and familiarity but risks prioritizing rote memorization over critical thinking. The study underscores the need for a balanced education evaluation framework that integrates the strengths of both assessments. A hybrid model combining standardized evaluation with competency-based assessments could enhance educational outcomes. Policymakers must consider sustainable education reforms that align with Indonesia’s development goals while ensuring equitable access to quality education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JPG (Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi)
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20527/jpg.v12i1.21882
Primary Topic
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming Education Policy: From National Assessment to National Exam and Its Impact on Learning Quality in Indonesia

Syahril Chaniago, Imam Ibnu Hazar, Lia Mahwaty
JPG (Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi)
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
article

Transforming Education Policy: From National Assessment to National Exam and Its Impact on Learning Quality in Indonesia

Syahril Chaniago, Imam Ibnu Hazar, Lia Mahwaty
article en

Abstract

Education policy in Indonesia has undergone a significant shift from the National Assessment (AN) back to the National Examination (UN). This transition reflects concerns about infrastructure readiness, assessment effectiveness, and policy continuity. Using a qualitative approach, this study compares AN and UN, evaluating their implications for learning quality, equity, and systemic readiness. The findings highlight that while AN promotes holistic education by assessing literacy, numeracy, and character development, its implementation is hindered by technological and resource disparities. Conversely, the UN provides clear benchmarks and familiarity but risks prioritizing rote memorization over critical thinking. The study underscores the need for a balanced education evaluation framework that integrates the strengths of both assessments. A hybrid model combining standardized evaluation with competency-based assessments could enhance educational outcomes. Policymakers must consider sustainable education reforms that align with Indonesia’s development goals while ensuring equitable access to quality education.

JPG (Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi)Vol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.