Analysis of current methods for determining saturation flows at urban controlled intersections

The process of updating regulatory documentation in the Russian Federation involves the implementation of a system of national and transitional national standards (GOST, PNST), and the phasing out of such forms of documentation as SP, ODM, etc. According to federal law, regulatory documents must not contain duplicative provisions. Currently, two standardized methodologies, based on domestic research findings and the Highway Capacity Manual standards adopted in the USA, are used to calculate saturation flow and traffic capacity at controlled intersections. These methodologies are formalized as industry road standards. The purpose of this article is to analyze the existing methodologies for calculating the saturation flow and the average delay per vehicle, as well as to compare the calculated saturation flow values from the presented documents using the example of regulated intersections. While the values of transport delays at intersections with a load factor below 1 are generally similar (calculation discrepancies are within 10%), a difference was found between the values obtained using Webster’s method and the method based on the Highway Capacity Manual when the load factor is equal to or exceeds 1. The incorrect application of these coefficients has a cumulative effect and affects the overall accuracy of calculations. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a unified national standard for calculating saturation flow and traffic capacity, taking into account the findings of both domestic and international research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architecture Construction Transport
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31660/2782-232x-2025-1-112-124
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of current methods for determining saturation flows at urban controlled intersections

E. N. Legostaeva, Evgeny Leverents, D. A. Genze, Roman Andronov et al.
Architecture Construction Transport
Traffic control and management
article

Analysis of current methods for determining saturation flows at urban controlled intersections

E. N. Legostaeva, Evgeny Leverents, D. A. Genze, Roman Andronov, V. S. Motelika
article en

Abstract

The process of updating regulatory documentation in the Russian Federation involves the implementation of a system of national and transitional national standards (GOST, PNST), and the phasing out of such forms of documentation as SP, ODM, etc. According to federal law, regulatory documents must not contain duplicative provisions. Currently, two standardized methodologies, based on domestic research findings and the Highway Capacity Manual standards adopted in the USA, are used to calculate saturation flow and traffic capacity at controlled intersections. These methodologies are formalized as industry road standards. The purpose of this article is to analyze the existing methodologies for calculating the saturation flow and the average delay per vehicle, as well as to compare the calculated saturation flow values from the presented documents using the example of regulated intersections. While the values of transport delays at intersections with a load factor below 1 are generally similar (calculation discrepancies are within 10%), a difference was found between the values obtained using Webster’s method and the method based on the Highway Capacity Manual when the load factor is equal to or exceeds 1. The incorrect application of these coefficients has a cumulative effect and affects the overall accuracy of calculations. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a unified national standard for calculating saturation flow and traffic capacity, taking into account the findings of both domestic and international research.

Architecture Construction TransportVol. 5(1)
Industrial University of Tyumen (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.