Inverse Faraday effect and Stokes drift in plasma

Recent theory of the light-induced medium magnetization (inverse Faraday effect, IFE) performed by a transversely-limited circularly-polarized light beam [Phys. Rev. B 91, 020411 (2015)] predicts the existence of a “demagnetization current” (DC) at the beam periphery which, apparently, acts oppositely to the light-induced rotational motion of the charge carriers inside the beam and thus reduces the IFE by the factor of 2. In this note, taking the longitudinal component of the beam into account, we show that the peripheral DC is two times higher than was calculated before. Nevertheless, this circumstance does not cancel the IFE because the DC, as a sort of Stokes-drift current in plasma [Phys. Rev. E 105, 065208 (2022)], is accompanied by the additional "magnetization current" of the opposite direction.It is this current that is responsible for the medium magnetization, despite that, being a sort of the “bound” current, it performs no real charge transport and cannot be observed directly (akin to the Ampere currents in permanent magnets).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of aerodisperse systems
Published
2024-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18524/0367-1631.2024.62.318607
Primary Topic
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inverse Faraday effect and Stokes drift in plasma

A. Ya. Bekshaev
Physics of aerodisperse systems
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
article

Inverse Faraday effect and Stokes drift in plasma

A. Ya. Bekshaev
article en

Abstract

Recent theory of the light-induced medium magnetization (inverse Faraday effect, IFE) performed by a transversely-limited circularly-polarized light beam [Phys. Rev. B 91, 020411 (2015)] predicts the existence of a “demagnetization current” (DC) at the beam periphery which, apparently, acts oppositely to the light-induced rotational motion of the charge carriers inside the beam and thus reduces the IFE by the factor of 2. In this note, taking the longitudinal component of the beam into account, we show that the peripheral DC is two times higher than was calculated before. Nevertheless, this circumstance does not cancel the IFE because the DC, as a sort of Stokes-drift current in plasma [Phys. Rev. E 105, 065208 (2022)], is accompanied by the additional "magnetization current" of the opposite direction.It is this current that is responsible for the medium magnetization, despite that, being a sort of the “bound” current, it performs no real charge transport and cannot be observed directly (akin to the Ampere currents in permanent magnets).

Physics of aerodisperse systems(62)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.