Impact of Ablation Energy Sources on Perceived Quality of Life and Symptom in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Comparative Study

<b>Background</b>: Catheter ablation is a first-line treatment for rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with different energy sources available, including pulsed-field ablation (PFA), high-power short-duration radiofrequency (HPSD RF), conventional radiofrequency (RF), and cryoballoon ablation. Limited evidence exists on how different ablation techniques affect patient-reported outcomes, such as patients' quality of life (QoL) and perceived symptoms. This study aims to assess the impact of ablation energy sources on reported QoL and symptom perception after AF ablation. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 148 patients who underwent catheter ablation in different centers. Patients were divided into four groups according to the energy source used. Follow-up was conducted during the 6 months post-procedure. Patients were asked to complete a 20-item questionnaire evaluating quality of life, activity resumption, recovery process, perceived symptoms, and satisfaction. Comparative analyses were performed across energy groups, anesthesia types, and anesthetic drugs. <b>Results</b>: PFA patients reported the highest improvement in QoL scores compared to RF, HPSD RF, and cryoablation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Activity resumption and symptom relief were significantly better in the PFA group compared to others (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Anesthesia type and anesthetic drug influenced QoL outcomes, with patients under general anesthesia showing higher QoL scores compared to deep sedation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The energy source and anesthetic drug resulted in independent predictors of QoL improvement. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ablation energy source could impact patients' perceived QoL and symptom relief after AF ablation. PFA demonstrated superior performance scores in QoL and symptom perception compared to other techniques. Anesthetic drugs also play a role in patient-reported outcomes and activity resumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082741
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Ablation Energy Sources on Perceived Quality of Life and Symptom in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Comparative Study

Marco Galeazzi, Michela Bonanni, Claudio Pandozi, Nicola Pierucci et al.
8 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
11.11
article

Impact of Ablation Energy Sources on Perceived Quality of Life and Symptom in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Comparative Study

Marco Galeazzi, Michela Bonanni, Claudio Pandozi, Nicola Pierucci, Maurizio Russo, Stefania Angela Di Fusco, Andrea Matteucci, Marco Valerio Mariani, Furio Colivicchi, Federico Nardi, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Catheter ablation is a first-line treatment for rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with different energy sources available, including pulsed-field ablation (PFA), high-power short-duration radiofrequency (HPSD RF), conventional radiofrequency (RF), and cryoballoon ablation. Limited evidence exists on how different ablation techniques affect patient-reported outcomes, such as patients' quality of life (QoL) and perceived symptoms. This study aims to assess the impact of ablation energy sources on reported QoL and symptom perception after AF ablation. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 148 patients who underwent catheter ablation in different centers. Patients were divided into four groups according to the energy source used. Follow-up was conducted during the 6 months post-procedure. Patients were asked to complete a 20-item questionnaire evaluating quality of life, activity resumption, recovery process, perceived symptoms, and satisfaction. Comparative analyses were performed across energy groups, anesthesia types, and anesthetic drugs. <b>Results</b>: PFA patients reported the highest improvement in QoL scores compared to RF, HPSD RF, and cryoablation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Activity resumption and symptom relief were significantly better in the PFA group compared to others (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Anesthesia type and anesthetic drug influenced QoL outcomes, with patients under general anesthesia showing higher QoL scores compared to deep sedation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The energy source and anesthetic drug resulted in independent predictors of QoL improvement. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ablation energy source could impact patients' perceived QoL and symptom relief after AF ablation. PFA demonstrated superior performance scores in QoL and symptom perception compared to other techniques. Anesthetic drugs also play a role in patient-reported outcomes and activity resumption.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(8)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Ospedale San Filippo Neri (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Alessandria (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
11.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.