Air-Q as an intubating LMA: Insights from a case series

Air-Q as an intubating LMA: Insights from a case series - Background and Aims: The Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA) is a second-generation supraglottic device designed for use as a bridging conduit in both conventional and fiberoptic intubation, particularly in difficult airway scenarios. This case series evaluates the performance of the Air-Q ILA in terms of ease of intubation, success rates, airway morbidity, and hemodynamic responses. While the device offers advantages like reduced hemodynamic stress and minimal airway trauma, limitations such as risks of regurgitation, aspiration, air leaks, and displacement remain considerations. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of the Air-Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation, focusing on key performance metrics, including ease of use, success rates, airway morbidity, and hemodynamic responses. Methodology: This case series included 15 patients of ASA I and II status, weighing 50–70 kg, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. After achieving adequate muscle relaxation, an Air-Q ILA size 3.5 was introduced. Device placement was confirmed by ensuring adequate ventilation and performing fiberoptic visualization using the Brimacombe and Berry scoring system. A cuffed Portex endotracheal tube was inserted through the Air-Q device, and intubation was confirmed via capnography. The time taken for device placement (Air-Q insertion to ventilation confirmation) and tube insertion (intubation confirmation via capnography) was recorded. Ease of intubation and the number of attempts required were also noted. Standard ASA monitoring protocols were maintained throughout the procedure. Results: Brimacombe and Berry score as per fiberoptic view was 4 in 9 patients and 3 in 2 patients and 1 in 4 patients. Mean Air-Q placement time was 18.04 + 1.39 seconds and tube placement time was 21 + 1.61 seconds. Successful intubation was achieved in 11 of 15 patients (73%), with 9 intubated on the first attempt and 2 on the second attempt. Conclusion: The Air-Q ILA is an effective supraglottic device that provides both ventilation and a reliable conduit for blind intubation using standard endotracheal tubes. It facilitates shorter intubation times and minimizes hemodynamic stress, making it a valuable tool in airway management. Keywords: Air-Q, Intubating laryngeal airway, Endotracheal intubation, Fiberoptic view, Hemodynamic response.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2025.059
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air-Q as an intubating LMA: Insights from a case series

Vishal Shrimali, Sanskriti Patel, Shaji Shara Manuel Azikakath, Deep Pareshkumar Unadkat et al.
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Air-Q as an intubating LMA: Insights from a case series

Vishal Shrimali, Sanskriti Patel, Shaji Shara Manuel Azikakath, Deep Pareshkumar Unadkat, Anup shrichand Chandnani
article en

Abstract

Air-Q as an intubating LMA: Insights from a case series - Background and Aims: The Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA) is a second-generation supraglottic device designed for use as a bridging conduit in both conventional and fiberoptic intubation, particularly in difficult airway scenarios. This case series evaluates the performance of the Air-Q ILA in terms of ease of intubation, success rates, airway morbidity, and hemodynamic responses. While the device offers advantages like reduced hemodynamic stress and minimal airway trauma, limitations such as risks of regurgitation, aspiration, air leaks, and displacement remain considerations. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of the Air-Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation, focusing on key performance metrics, including ease of use, success rates, airway morbidity, and hemodynamic responses. Methodology: This case series included 15 patients of ASA I and II status, weighing 50–70 kg, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. After achieving adequate muscle relaxation, an Air-Q ILA size 3.5 was introduced. Device placement was confirmed by ensuring adequate ventilation and performing fiberoptic visualization using the Brimacombe and Berry scoring system. A cuffed Portex endotracheal tube was inserted through the Air-Q device, and intubation was confirmed via capnography. The time taken for device placement (Air-Q insertion to ventilation confirmation) and tube insertion (intubation confirmation via capnography) was recorded. Ease of intubation and the number of attempts required were also noted. Standard ASA monitoring protocols were maintained throughout the procedure. Results: Brimacombe and Berry score as per fiberoptic view was 4 in 9 patients and 3 in 2 patients and 1 in 4 patients. Mean Air-Q placement time was 18.04 + 1.39 seconds and tube placement time was 21 + 1.61 seconds. Successful intubation was achieved in 11 of 15 patients (73%), with 9 intubated on the first attempt and 2 on the second attempt. Conclusion: The Air-Q ILA is an effective supraglottic device that provides both ventilation and a reliable conduit for blind intubation using standard endotracheal tubes. It facilitates shorter intubation times and minimizes hemodynamic stress, making it a valuable tool in airway management. Keywords: Air-Q, Intubating laryngeal airway, Endotracheal intubation, Fiberoptic view, Hemodynamic response.

Indian Journal of Clinical AnaesthesiaVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.