Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning for subarachnoid block versus landmark guided subarachnoid block in obese patients: A prospective randomized controlled study

Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning for subarachnoid block versus landmark guided subarachnoid block in obese patients: A prospective randomized controlled study - Background and Aim of the Study: Obese patients present unique challenges for subarachnoid block due to difficulty in identifying surface landmarks, which increases the risk of multiple attempts and complications. Pre-procedural ultrasound (US) guidance can enhance precision in identifying intervertebral spaces. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided techniques for spinal anaesthesia in obese patients. The primary objective was to compare the number of attempts required for successful subarachnoid block, while secondary objectives included comparisons of needle passes, time to identify intervertebral space, time for successful lumbar puncture, and time to achieve successful subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 90 obese patients (BMI 30–40 kg/m?2;) scheduled for surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to either Group-L (landmark-guided, n=45) or Group-P (US-guided, n=45). Data collected included the number of attempts, needle passes, time to identify intervertebral space, time for scanning, time for lumbar puncture, and time to achieve successful subarachnoid block. Result: The mean number of attempts for Group P (1.42 ± 0.62) was significantly lower than Group L (1.91 ± 0.73, p < 0>p < 0>p < 0> Conclusion: Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning significantly improves the success rate of subarachnoid block in obese patients by reducing the number of attempts, needle passes, and procedural time compared to the traditional landmark-guided technique. Keywords: Subarachnoid block, Ultrasound guidance, Obese patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2025.051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning for subarachnoid block versus landmark guided subarachnoid block in obese patients: A prospective randomized controlled study

Pinal Raj Bumiya, Kavita Shyam Lalchandan, Nimisha Nayani, Mittal Bhuriya et al.
1 citations
Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
1.39
article

Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning for subarachnoid block versus landmark guided subarachnoid block in obese patients: A prospective randomized controlled study

Pinal Raj Bumiya, Kavita Shyam Lalchandan, Nimisha Nayani, Mittal Bhuriya, Nirali Godhani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning for subarachnoid block versus landmark guided subarachnoid block in obese patients: A prospective randomized controlled study - Background and Aim of the Study: Obese patients present unique challenges for subarachnoid block due to difficulty in identifying surface landmarks, which increases the risk of multiple attempts and complications. Pre-procedural ultrasound (US) guidance can enhance precision in identifying intervertebral spaces. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided techniques for spinal anaesthesia in obese patients. The primary objective was to compare the number of attempts required for successful subarachnoid block, while secondary objectives included comparisons of needle passes, time to identify intervertebral space, time for successful lumbar puncture, and time to achieve successful subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 90 obese patients (BMI 30–40 kg/m?2;) scheduled for surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to either Group-L (landmark-guided, n=45) or Group-P (US-guided, n=45). Data collected included the number of attempts, needle passes, time to identify intervertebral space, time for scanning, time for lumbar puncture, and time to achieve successful subarachnoid block. Result: The mean number of attempts for Group P (1.42 ± 0.62) was significantly lower than Group L (1.91 ± 0.73, p < 0>p < 0>p < 0> Conclusion: Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning significantly improves the success rate of subarachnoid block in obese patients by reducing the number of attempts, needle passes, and procedural time compared to the traditional landmark-guided technique. Keywords: Subarachnoid block, Ultrasound guidance, Obese patients.

Indian Journal of Clinical AnaesthesiaVol. 12(2)
Sir Sayajirao General Hospital Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN), Government Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.