Applying a comparative performance assessment framework to different airspace management concepts for urban air mobility

Abstract With the emerging industry of Urban Air Mobility (UAM), a multitude of ideas and concepts are being explored and elaborated to deliver an integrated and harmonized UAM ecosystem. These ideas and concepts are involved in all aspects of the UAM ecosystem, including vehicle technology, airspace system design, infrastructure, and governing regulations. Along with the significant progress on the different UAM research topics, comparative assessment frameworks are also being proposed to objectively compare them. Before UAM deployment, stakeholders need to compare the different approaches and determine which one is the better fit to specific needs. This paper focuses on assessing concepts related to UAM airspace management. It aims to apply a comparative assessment framework to three concepts, namely Slot-Based Approach (SBA), Trajectory-Based Approach (TBA), both developed by DLR within the HorizonUAM project, and Corridor-Based Approach (CBA) developed by NASA under the Air Traffic Management–eXploration (ATM-X) project. This paper describes an initial comparative study while delivering the first key findings. The applied methodology is based on simulation runs conducted in different urban areas, Hamburg and Dallas/Fort Worth, using two simulation platforms namely a DLR Simulation using the Remote Component Environment (RCE) and the NASA-developed simulation platform called TestBed. The collected results shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of each airspace management concept and help to identify key distinctions between the concepts. Solutions and concepts are often tailored to a specific city, making it difficult to replicate and scale. Indeed, there is no one-size-fits-all concept. This study demonstrates the general applicability of the proposed performance assessment methodology and can serve as the basis for further comparison studies of future airspace management concepts for UAM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-025-00835-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying a comparative performance assessment framework to different airspace management concepts for urban air mobility

Chu Han Lee, Niklas Peinecke, Kushal Moolchandani, Rabeb Abdellaoui et al.
2 citations
CEAS Aeronautical Journal
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
9.99
article

Applying a comparative performance assessment framework to different airspace management concepts for urban air mobility

Chu Han Lee, Niklas Peinecke, Kushal Moolchandani, Rabeb Abdellaoui, Asija Velieva, Hanbong Lee, Fares Naser, F. S. Chu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract With the emerging industry of Urban Air Mobility (UAM), a multitude of ideas and concepts are being explored and elaborated to deliver an integrated and harmonized UAM ecosystem. These ideas and concepts are involved in all aspects of the UAM ecosystem, including vehicle technology, airspace system design, infrastructure, and governing regulations. Along with the significant progress on the different UAM research topics, comparative assessment frameworks are also being proposed to objectively compare them. Before UAM deployment, stakeholders need to compare the different approaches and determine which one is the better fit to specific needs. This paper focuses on assessing concepts related to UAM airspace management. It aims to apply a comparative assessment framework to three concepts, namely Slot-Based Approach (SBA), Trajectory-Based Approach (TBA), both developed by DLR within the HorizonUAM project, and Corridor-Based Approach (CBA) developed by NASA under the Air Traffic Management–eXploration (ATM-X) project. This paper describes an initial comparative study while delivering the first key findings. The applied methodology is based on simulation runs conducted in different urban areas, Hamburg and Dallas/Fort Worth, using two simulation platforms namely a DLR Simulation using the Remote Component Environment (RCE) and the NASA-developed simulation platform called TestBed. The collected results shed light on the advantages and disadvantages of each airspace management concept and help to identify key distinctions between the concepts. Solutions and concepts are often tailored to a specific city, making it difficult to replicate and scale. Indeed, there is no one-size-fits-all concept. This study demonstrates the general applicability of the proposed performance assessment methodology and can serve as the basis for further comparison studies of future airspace management concepts for UAM.

CEAS Aeronautical JournalVol. 16(3)
Ames Research Center (US), Universities Space Research Association (US), NASA Research Park (US), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.