Development and Validation of the Self-Perceived Anhedonia Scale for Adults: A Novel Tool for Assessing Pleasure Deficits

Background: The present study focuses on the development and validation of the Self-Perceived Anhedonia Scale for Adults (SPAS-A), a novel instrument designed to assess pleasure deficits across multiple dimensions of anhedonia, including social, physical, cognitive, and emotional facets. The study aimed to establish the psychometric properties of the scale, including its reliability and validity. Materials and methods: All the data were collected from a sample of 600 participants between February 2024 and November 2024 via Google Forms. Results: Factorial analysis, including Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 72.4% of the total variance, which demonstrated a coherent and multidimensional representation of anhedonia. The reliability of the scale was further supported by high Cronbach’s Alpha values for each subscale, with social anhedonia showing an exceptional value of 0.916, followed by emotional (0.905), cognitive (0.900), and physical (0.873) anhedonia. Conclusions: These findings indicate that SPAS-A is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pleasure deficits in adults, providing a comprehensive measure of anhedonia that can be utilized in both clinical and research settings. Future studies could benefit from longitudinal designs and more diverse samples to better understand the temporal and cultural variability of anhedonia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry International
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6020043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the Self-Perceived Anhedonia Scale for Adults: A Novel Tool for Assessing Pleasure Deficits

Ioana Elena Cioca, Elena-Nicoleta Bordea, Maria-Veronica Morcov, Corina Sporea et al.
2 citations
Psychiatry International
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
4.24
article

Development and Validation of the Self-Perceived Anhedonia Scale for Adults: A Novel Tool for Assessing Pleasure Deficits

Ioana Elena Cioca, Elena-Nicoleta Bordea, Maria-Veronica Morcov, Corina Sporea, Angelo M. Pellegrini, Cristian Gabriel Morcov, Oana Alina Apostol
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: The present study focuses on the development and validation of the Self-Perceived Anhedonia Scale for Adults (SPAS-A), a novel instrument designed to assess pleasure deficits across multiple dimensions of anhedonia, including social, physical, cognitive, and emotional facets. The study aimed to establish the psychometric properties of the scale, including its reliability and validity. Materials and methods: All the data were collected from a sample of 600 participants between February 2024 and November 2024 via Google Forms. Results: Factorial analysis, including Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, revealed a four-factor structure, accounting for 72.4% of the total variance, which demonstrated a coherent and multidimensional representation of anhedonia. The reliability of the scale was further supported by high Cronbach’s Alpha values for each subscale, with social anhedonia showing an exceptional value of 0.916, followed by emotional (0.905), cognitive (0.900), and physical (0.873) anhedonia. Conclusions: These findings indicate that SPAS-A is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pleasure deficits in adults, providing a comprehensive measure of anhedonia that can be utilized in both clinical and research settings. Future studies could benefit from longitudinal designs and more diverse samples to better understand the temporal and cultural variability of anhedonia.

Psychiatry InternationalVol. 6(2)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.