Application of the environmental impact assessment provisions under the BBNJ Agreement in high seas marine protected area: challenges and suggestion

Once the BBNJ Agreement enters into force, its environmental impact assessment (EIA) provisions will apply to high seas marine protected areas (MPAs). This paper examines current treaties and practices within four high seas MPAs and finds that the EIA provisions established by United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) are ambiguous. The BBNJ Agreement, however, reflects a strong commitment to improving EIA laws and practices in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Despite this progress, several challenges may arise in implementing the BBNJ Agreement’s EIA provisions in high seas MPAs. These include potential fragmentation when members of the international frameworks or bodies (IFBs) of high seas MPAs do not ratify the agreement, uncertainties surrounding the “not undermine” proviso, and ambiguities in the “due regard” principle. Additionally, the Clearing-House Mechanism (Cl-HM) under the BBNJ Agreement requires further development to cooperate with the institutions of high seas MPAs, and the fragmented EIA standards, subjects and procedures for high seas MPAs complicate the determination of equivalency with those under the BBNJ Agreement. Moreover, the EIA provisions for existing high seas MPAs appear limited. It is worth mentioning that the practices of the EIA in high seas MPAs may not be sufficient. This paper offers several recommendations for the above challenges: encouraging non-Parties to apply the EIA provisions under the BBNJ Agreement, putting forward a possible interpretation or understanding for the “not undermine” proviso and “due regard”, developing the CL-HM through the BBNJ Secretariat, and developing EIA guidelines for high seas MPAs, supported by the Scientific and Technical Body set by the BBNJ Agreement. Furthermore, members of the IFBs of high seas MPAs should enhance their EIA practices to ensure effective application of the BBNJ Agreement’s provisions in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1589936
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the environmental impact assessment provisions under the BBNJ Agreement in high seas marine protected area: challenges and suggestion

Yong Wang, Xin Pan
5 citations
Frontiers in Marine Science
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
12.11
article

Application of the environmental impact assessment provisions under the BBNJ Agreement in high seas marine protected area: challenges and suggestion

Yong Wang, Xin Pan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Once the BBNJ Agreement enters into force, its environmental impact assessment (EIA) provisions will apply to high seas marine protected areas (MPAs). This paper examines current treaties and practices within four high seas MPAs and finds that the EIA provisions established by United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) are ambiguous. The BBNJ Agreement, however, reflects a strong commitment to improving EIA laws and practices in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Despite this progress, several challenges may arise in implementing the BBNJ Agreement’s EIA provisions in high seas MPAs. These include potential fragmentation when members of the international frameworks or bodies (IFBs) of high seas MPAs do not ratify the agreement, uncertainties surrounding the “not undermine” proviso, and ambiguities in the “due regard” principle. Additionally, the Clearing-House Mechanism (Cl-HM) under the BBNJ Agreement requires further development to cooperate with the institutions of high seas MPAs, and the fragmented EIA standards, subjects and procedures for high seas MPAs complicate the determination of equivalency with those under the BBNJ Agreement. Moreover, the EIA provisions for existing high seas MPAs appear limited. It is worth mentioning that the practices of the EIA in high seas MPAs may not be sufficient. This paper offers several recommendations for the above challenges: encouraging non-Parties to apply the EIA provisions under the BBNJ Agreement, putting forward a possible interpretation or understanding for the “not undermine” proviso and “due regard”, developing the CL-HM through the BBNJ Secretariat, and developing EIA guidelines for high seas MPAs, supported by the Scientific and Technical Body set by the BBNJ Agreement. Furthermore, members of the IFBs of high seas MPAs should enhance their EIA practices to ensure effective application of the BBNJ Agreement’s provisions in the future.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
Jinan University (CN), University of International Relations (CN), East China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.