Effects of fermented wheat bran on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of fermented wheat bran (FWB) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum biochemistry, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets. One hundred twenty-eight weaned piglets were randomly assigned to 4 groups, each with 8 pens and 4 piglets per pen: basal diet group (BD), 5% wheat bran group (5% WB), 5% fermented wheat bran group (5% FWB), and 10% fermented wheat bran group (10% FWB) for a 28-day trial. Results showed that compared to the BD group, the diarrhea rate in the 5% WB group was significantly increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at d 15-28 and d 1-28. In contrast, at d 15-28 and d 1-28, the diarrhea rates in the 5% FWB and 10% FWB groups were significantly lower than those in the 5% WB group and showed no significant difference compared to the BD group. Moreover, the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of DM, GE, CP, EE, CF and ADF at d 1-14, and EE and NDF at d 15-28 in the 5% FWB group were significantly improved compared to the 5% WB group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, only the ATTD of CP, EE and CF at d 1-14 in the 10% FWB group were significantly higher than those in the 5% WB group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared to the BD group, the pH of cecum chyme and serum urea nitrogen content in the 5% FWB and 10% FWB groups were significantly reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and those in the 10% FWB group were significantly lower than those in the 5% WB group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The propionic acid content of cecum chyme in the 5% FWB and 10% FWB groups, and butyric acid content in the 10% FWB group were significantly higher than those in the BD group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). LEfSe analysis (LDA score > 3.0) identified 4 species, 6 species of Proteobacteria, 2 species, and 9 species that were enriched in the BD, 5% WB, 5%F WB and 10%F WB groups, respectively. Additionally, <i>Dialister</i>, <i>Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group</i>, <i>Mitsuokella</i>, <i>Succinivibrio</i>, and <i>Prevotella</i> were significantly and positively correlated with the concentrations of valeric acid, propionic acid, and acetic acid (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, 10% FWB supplementation in weaned piglet diets did not affect growth performance, it reduced the diarrhea rate compared to the 5% WB group, potentially due to enhanced nutrient digestibility, elevated SCFAs levels, and shifts in microbial composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1561196
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of fermented wheat bran on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets

Hua Zhao, Hefeng Luo, Massimo Trabalza‐Marinucci, Fali Wu et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
3.81
article

Effects of fermented wheat bran on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets

Hua Zhao, Hefeng Luo, Massimo Trabalza‐Marinucci, Fali Wu, Xiao-Tong Wei, Ruinan Zhang, Gang Jia, Lianqiang Che, Ninghui Jia, Hua Li, Qiang Zhou, Jin Jin, Jiayong Tang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of fermented wheat bran (FWB) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum biochemistry, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets. One hundred twenty-eight weaned piglets were randomly assigned to 4 groups, each with 8 pens and 4 piglets per pen: basal diet group (BD), 5% wheat bran group (5% WB), 5% fermented wheat bran group (5% FWB), and 10% fermented wheat bran group (10% FWB) for a 28-day trial. Results showed that compared to the BD group, the diarrhea rate in the 5% WB group was significantly increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at d 15-28 and d 1-28. In contrast, at d 15-28 and d 1-28, the diarrhea rates in the 5% FWB and 10% FWB groups were significantly lower than those in the 5% WB group and showed no significant difference compared to the BD group. Moreover, the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of DM, GE, CP, EE, CF and ADF at d 1-14, and EE and NDF at d 15-28 in the 5% FWB group were significantly improved compared to the 5% WB group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, only the ATTD of CP, EE and CF at d 1-14 in the 10% FWB group were significantly higher than those in the 5% WB group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared to the BD group, the pH of cecum chyme and serum urea nitrogen content in the 5% FWB and 10% FWB groups were significantly reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and those in the 10% FWB group were significantly lower than those in the 5% WB group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The propionic acid content of cecum chyme in the 5% FWB and 10% FWB groups, and butyric acid content in the 10% FWB group were significantly higher than those in the BD group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). LEfSe analysis (LDA score > 3.0) identified 4 species, 6 species of Proteobacteria, 2 species, and 9 species that were enriched in the BD, 5% WB, 5%F WB and 10%F WB groups, respectively. Additionally, <i>Dialister</i>, <i>Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group</i>, <i>Mitsuokella</i>, <i>Succinivibrio</i>, and <i>Prevotella</i> were significantly and positively correlated with the concentrations of valeric acid, propionic acid, and acetic acid (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, 10% FWB supplementation in weaned piglet diets did not affect growth performance, it reduced the diarrhea rate compared to the 5% WB group, potentially due to enhanced nutrient digestibility, elevated SCFAs levels, and shifts in microbial composition.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
University of Perugia (IT), Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.