The influence of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavioral intentions and the role of belief in a just world

To examine the impact of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavior intentions and the positive moderating role of belief in a just world, two experiments were conducted. Study 1 recruited 176 participants aged 18–22 years (57 males, 119 females) and manipulated vicarious exclusion using a situational imagery paradigm to assess its effect on prosocial behavior intentions. Study 2 involved 284 participants aged 18–22 years (97 males, 187 females) and utilized the Cyberball paradigm to manipulate vicarious exclusion, further exploring the moderating role of belief in a just world. The results revealed that vicarious exclusion significantly predicted a decrease in prosocial behavior intentions. Furthermore, belief in a just world positively moderated this relationship, such that individuals with higher belief in a just world were less affected by the negative impact of vicarious exclusion on their prosocial behavior intentions. This study highlights the negative influence of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavior intentions and the protective role of belief in a just world, providing theoretical support for understanding individuals’ coping mechanisms in response to social exclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04829-5
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavioral intentions and the role of belief in a just world

Yiran Wang, Xidan Xiao
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

The influence of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavioral intentions and the role of belief in a just world

Yiran Wang, Xidan Xiao
article en

Abstract

To examine the impact of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavior intentions and the positive moderating role of belief in a just world, two experiments were conducted. Study 1 recruited 176 participants aged 18–22 years (57 males, 119 females) and manipulated vicarious exclusion using a situational imagery paradigm to assess its effect on prosocial behavior intentions. Study 2 involved 284 participants aged 18–22 years (97 males, 187 females) and utilized the Cyberball paradigm to manipulate vicarious exclusion, further exploring the moderating role of belief in a just world. The results revealed that vicarious exclusion significantly predicted a decrease in prosocial behavior intentions. Furthermore, belief in a just world positively moderated this relationship, such that individuals with higher belief in a just world were less affected by the negative impact of vicarious exclusion on their prosocial behavior intentions. This study highlights the negative influence of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavior intentions and the protective role of belief in a just world, providing theoretical support for understanding individuals’ coping mechanisms in response to social exclusion.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Fujian Normal University (CN), Guangxi University (CN), Nanning Normal University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The influence of vicarious exclusion on prosocial behavioral intentions and the role of belief in a just world — Yiran Wang, Xidan Xiao · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS