Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability

To understand the intrinsic causes and influencing factors of shale wellbore instability, the anisotropic mechanical properties of layered rocks is analyzed. Using the existing strength test data of shale with different bedding angles, the variation characteristics of rock strength with bedding are investigated, and the prediction accuracy of different types of anisotropic strength criteria are validated by using the experimental data. Then, based on the thermal-hydro-mechanical stress model of the cemented wellbore, combined with the selected anisotropic strength criteria, we conducted a systematic study on the variation law of wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations. The results show that the Pariseau criterion can distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding, but the prediction error is large. In contrast, the single plane of weakness model (SPW) and patchy plane of weakness model (PPW) criteria cannot distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding but have better predictive performance for the strength during shear slip failure along the bedding plane. Additionally, the PPW criterion has higher prediction accuracy for rock strength than the SPW criterion within the bedding angle ranges of 0 ~ β1 and β2 ~ 90°. The collapse pressure contour maps predicted by the SPW and PPW criteria are similar, while those predicted by the Pariseau criterion show significant differences, with the Pariseau criterion underestimating the wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations, potentially leading to severe consequences. The predictions of the PPW and SPW criteria are safer and more reliable. In the studied layered shale formations, when the well deviation angle is less than 60°, drilling along the up-dip direction provides better wellbore stability; when the well deviation angle is greater than 60°, drilling along the down-dip direction provides better wellbore stability. Additionally, under any bedding orientation condition, the collapse pressure of a horizontal well is higher than that of a vertical well, but the collapse pressure of a vertical well is more sensitive to changes in bedding orientation, with greater fluctuation range. These research findings provide a scientific basis for the design and construction schemes of drilling engineering, ensuring the safety and efficiency of drilling operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-00952-4
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability

Hongge Jia, Jinyou Zhang, Zhongmin Wang, Xuejia Du et al.
4 citations
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Drilling and Well Engineering
4.58
article

Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability

Hongge Jia, Jinyou Zhang, Zhongmin Wang, Xuejia Du, Mingming Zhang, Xiaobo Liu, Guoqiang Pan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

To understand the intrinsic causes and influencing factors of shale wellbore instability, the anisotropic mechanical properties of layered rocks is analyzed. Using the existing strength test data of shale with different bedding angles, the variation characteristics of rock strength with bedding are investigated, and the prediction accuracy of different types of anisotropic strength criteria are validated by using the experimental data. Then, based on the thermal-hydro-mechanical stress model of the cemented wellbore, combined with the selected anisotropic strength criteria, we conducted a systematic study on the variation law of wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations. The results show that the Pariseau criterion can distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding, but the prediction error is large. In contrast, the single plane of weakness model (SPW) and patchy plane of weakness model (PPW) criteria cannot distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding but have better predictive performance for the strength during shear slip failure along the bedding plane. Additionally, the PPW criterion has higher prediction accuracy for rock strength than the SPW criterion within the bedding angle ranges of 0 ~ β1 and β2 ~ 90°. The collapse pressure contour maps predicted by the SPW and PPW criteria are similar, while those predicted by the Pariseau criterion show significant differences, with the Pariseau criterion underestimating the wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations, potentially leading to severe consequences. The predictions of the PPW and SPW criteria are safer and more reliable. In the studied layered shale formations, when the well deviation angle is less than 60°, drilling along the up-dip direction provides better wellbore stability; when the well deviation angle is greater than 60°, drilling along the down-dip direction provides better wellbore stability. Additionally, under any bedding orientation condition, the collapse pressure of a horizontal well is higher than that of a vertical well, but the collapse pressure of a vertical well is more sensitive to changes in bedding orientation, with greater fluctuation range. These research findings provide a scientific basis for the design and construction schemes of drilling engineering, ensuring the safety and efficiency of drilling operations.

Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-ResourcesVol. 11(1)
Sinopec (China) (CN), Daqing Oilfield General Hospital (CN), Kazakh-Russian International University (KZ), University of Houston (US), Northeast Petroleum University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Drilling and Well Engineering
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.