Evaluating Machine Learning–Based Probabilistic Lightning Forecasts Using the HRRR: A Comparison to Three Forecast Baselines

Abstract Probabilistic forecasts of lightning for the CONUS were generated by postprocessing the HRRR with neural networks (NNs). These NN probability forecasts (NNPFs) were produced for HRRR forecasts in 2021–22 using NNs trained with 0000 UTC HRRR forecasts from 2019 to 2020 paired with ≥1 observed cloud-to-ground (CG1) flash as the target variable. CG1-NNPF skill was evaluated against three baselines: smoothed HRRR-based surrogate lightning forecasts, SPC probabilistic thunderstorm outlooks, and calibrated ensemble thunderstorm guidance from the High-Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) system. The hourly maximum updraft speed (UP) diagnostic was the most skillful HRRR surrogate for predicting CG1, outperforming diagnostics such as hourly maximum lightning threat and updraft helicity. The UP forecasts were compared to the NNPFs by using the most skillful combination of UP threshold and smoothing length scale at each forecast hour. The 4- and 1-h CG1-NNPFs exceeded the skill of the UP forecasts in 2021 for nearly all forecast hours, with reduced skill differences overnight compared to the daytime. The NNPFs exhibited excellent reliability, with slight overforecasting of probabilities overnight. The NNPFs were more skillful than NOAA Storm Prediction Center (SPC) Thunderstorm Outlooks in both 2021 and 2022, especially overnight, while during the daytime, the SPC forecasts had similar or slightly greater skill. Finally, the NNPFs outperformed calibrated thunder guidance from the HREF system evaluated across forecasts in 2022. These findings imply that using NNs for thunderstorm prediction can improve upon existing non–machine learning baselines from deterministic and ensemble systems and may improve operational SPC thunderstorm forecasts. Significance Statement The prediction of where and when thunderstorms will occur remains a significant challenge for forecasters. In this work, we attempt to improve upon existing methods for thunderstorm prediction in the contiguous United States (CONUS) by using machine learning (ML). The ML system compares forecasts from a commonly used atmospheric model to observed lightning occurrence, correcting errors in the model forecasts and outputting probabilities for the occurrence of thunderstorms. The ML thunderstorm forecasts were compared to three different methods of generating thunderstorm forecasts during the years 2021 and 2022. In most situations, the ML thunderstorm forecasts were superior. Thus, using ML may improve thunderstorm forecasts across the CONUS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-24-0140.1
Primary Topic
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Machine Learning–Based Probabilistic Lightning Forecasts Using the HRRR: A Comparison to Three Forecast Baselines

David Ahijevych, Ryan A. Sobash
Weather and Forecasting
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
article

Evaluating Machine Learning–Based Probabilistic Lightning Forecasts Using the HRRR: A Comparison to Three Forecast Baselines

David Ahijevych, Ryan A. Sobash
article en

Abstract

Abstract Probabilistic forecasts of lightning for the CONUS were generated by postprocessing the HRRR with neural networks (NNs). These NN probability forecasts (NNPFs) were produced for HRRR forecasts in 2021–22 using NNs trained with 0000 UTC HRRR forecasts from 2019 to 2020 paired with ≥1 observed cloud-to-ground (CG1) flash as the target variable. CG1-NNPF skill was evaluated against three baselines: smoothed HRRR-based surrogate lightning forecasts, SPC probabilistic thunderstorm outlooks, and calibrated ensemble thunderstorm guidance from the High-Resolution Ensemble Forecast (HREF) system. The hourly maximum updraft speed (UP) diagnostic was the most skillful HRRR surrogate for predicting CG1, outperforming diagnostics such as hourly maximum lightning threat and updraft helicity. The UP forecasts were compared to the NNPFs by using the most skillful combination of UP threshold and smoothing length scale at each forecast hour. The 4- and 1-h CG1-NNPFs exceeded the skill of the UP forecasts in 2021 for nearly all forecast hours, with reduced skill differences overnight compared to the daytime. The NNPFs exhibited excellent reliability, with slight overforecasting of probabilities overnight. The NNPFs were more skillful than NOAA Storm Prediction Center (SPC) Thunderstorm Outlooks in both 2021 and 2022, especially overnight, while during the daytime, the SPC forecasts had similar or slightly greater skill. Finally, the NNPFs outperformed calibrated thunder guidance from the HREF system evaluated across forecasts in 2022. These findings imply that using NNs for thunderstorm prediction can improve upon existing non–machine learning baselines from deterministic and ensemble systems and may improve operational SPC thunderstorm forecasts. Significance Statement The prediction of where and when thunderstorms will occur remains a significant challenge for forecasters. In this work, we attempt to improve upon existing methods for thunderstorm prediction in the contiguous United States (CONUS) by using machine learning (ML). The ML system compares forecasts from a commonly used atmospheric model to observed lightning occurrence, correcting errors in the model forecasts and outputting probabilities for the occurrence of thunderstorms. The ML thunderstorm forecasts were compared to three different methods of generating thunderstorm forecasts during the years 2021 and 2022. In most situations, the ML thunderstorm forecasts were superior. Thus, using ML may improve thunderstorm forecasts across the CONUS.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 40(5)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.