‘This workshop was bright and beautiful’: insights into the process of co-production of images for decision aids with marginalised groups

This co-production project worked with groups often marginalised in research, in order to improve the accessibility and inclusivity of two online patient decision aids through the use of images. We share reflections on contributors’ experiences, and we make recommendations for other teams using co-production processes. The research team and public contributor panel chair invited people from a South Asian, Caribbean or African background, people aged under 30 or over 65 years, LGBTQI+ people, those living with access needs or disability, and those on a low income or without a job. Contributors reviewed the decision aids in advance, then attended two small-group workshops co-facilitated by an artist to co-create bespoke images. Contributors were reimbursed £50 for each workshop. We held workshops with 18 public contributors from marginalised groups. Five contributors wrote about their reflections on recruitment for the co-production activities, preparation for co-production, contributing to co-production, and next steps, identifying key learning for improving co-production processes. Sharing information before a co-production event is very important for empowering contributors and equalising power. Careful consideration about the potential impact of exposure to the project materials is important, and flexibility in how to contribute makes projects more inclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research for All
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.09.1.06
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘This workshop was bright and beautiful’: insights into the process of co-production of images for decision aids with marginalised groups

Rebecca Foster, Lesley Turner, Beth Coad, Caio Barros et al.
2 citations
Research for All
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.63
article

‘This workshop was bright and beautiful’: insights into the process of co-production of images for decision aids with marginalised groups

Rebecca Foster, Lesley Turner, Beth Coad, Caio Barros, Katherine Morton, Kelly Kohut, Claire Foster, S. Elwynn Taylor, J. R. Lloyd, Lily Barnett, Diana Eccles, Shakirat Kekere-Ekun, Eleanor Philpotts
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This co-production project worked with groups often marginalised in research, in order to improve the accessibility and inclusivity of two online patient decision aids through the use of images. We share reflections on contributors’ experiences, and we make recommendations for other teams using co-production processes. The research team and public contributor panel chair invited people from a South Asian, Caribbean or African background, people aged under 30 or over 65 years, LGBTQI+ people, those living with access needs or disability, and those on a low income or without a job. Contributors reviewed the decision aids in advance, then attended two small-group workshops co-facilitated by an artist to co-create bespoke images. Contributors were reimbursed £50 for each workshop. We held workshops with 18 public contributors from marginalised groups. Five contributors wrote about their reflections on recruitment for the co-production activities, preparation for co-production, contributing to co-production, and next steps, identifying key learning for improving co-production processes. Sharing information before a co-production event is very important for empowering contributors and equalising power. Careful consideration about the potential impact of exposure to the project materials is important, and flexibility in how to contribute makes projects more inclusive.

Research for AllVol. 9(1)
St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), ORCID (US), University of Southampton (GB)
Cancer Research UK, University of Southampton
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.