Criteria for Ranking Conferences

The ranking of scientific conferences plays a key role in the academic world, determining the significance and prestige of each event. The main results of ranking from the point of view of personalities are as follows: determining the quality and influence of the scientific conference; a guide for selecting a conference; encouragement to conduct quality research; formation of a scientific community; and improvement of the visibility and influence of the conference for the scientific community. This paper provides an overview of currently existing conference catalogs and conference ranking systems, both automatic ones and with the participation of expert councils. It is noted that the purpose of creating a national ranking system is to promote and popularize domestic conferences and journals. From a review of currently existing conference catalogs and conference ranking systems, the following criteria for ranking conferences can be formulated: indicators of publication activity, based on the results of the analysis of published conference materials; credibility of the speakers and the organizing committee of the conference; number of presentations and the ratio of the number of presentations to the number of conference participants; time for reviewing applications submitted to the conference; ratio of submitted and accepted applications; and retrospective and geographical parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s000510552570044x
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criteria for Ranking Conferences

Alexander Sergeevich Kozitsyn
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Criteria for Ranking Conferences

Alexander Sergeevich Kozitsyn
article en

Abstract

The ranking of scientific conferences plays a key role in the academic world, determining the significance and prestige of each event. The main results of ranking from the point of view of personalities are as follows: determining the quality and influence of the scientific conference; a guide for selecting a conference; encouragement to conduct quality research; formation of a scientific community; and improvement of the visibility and influence of the conference for the scientific community. This paper provides an overview of currently existing conference catalogs and conference ranking systems, both automatic ones and with the participation of expert councils. It is noted that the purpose of creating a national ranking system is to promote and popularize domestic conferences and journals. From a review of currently existing conference catalogs and conference ranking systems, the following criteria for ranking conferences can be formulated: indicators of publication activity, based on the results of the analysis of published conference materials; credibility of the speakers and the organizing committee of the conference; number of presentations and the ratio of the number of presentations to the number of conference participants; time for reviewing applications submitted to the conference; ratio of submitted and accepted applications; and retrospective and geographical parameters.

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical LinguisticsVol. 58(S6)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Criteria for Ranking Conferences — Alexander Sergeevich Kozitsyn · Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS