Responding to Moral Challenges in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinical Ethics Support Needs at Three Tanzanian Hospitals

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) encounter various moral challenges in clinical practice. In various countries, clinical ethics support (CES) services are developed to support HCPs. One of these CES services is clinical ethics committees (CECs): they address moral challenges faced in healthcare settings and offer support for HCPs. However, in Tanzania, CECs have not yet been implemented. For implementation purposes, greater knowledge about how healthcare professionals navigate and respond to moral challenges, their understanding of CECs, and what they perceive as key needs for implementing CECs in hospitals, are valuable. This study explores HCPs' ways of dealing with their moral challenges at the moment and identifies key needs for establishing CECs in Tanzanian healthcare settings in the near future. The findings show that various implicit ways have been acknowledged as being useful in addressing moral challenges (e.g., regular meetings, family conferences, social welfare units, hospital procedures and guidelines, as well as consulting legal and management units). In addition, HCPs reported that a necessity exists for implementing more formal and systematic modalities to address moral challenges in clinical settings. The research in this paper has served as a preparation for establishing the first CEC in Tanzanian healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HEC Forum
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-025-09547-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responding to Moral Challenges in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinical Ethics Support Needs at Three Tanzanian Hospitals

Bert Molewijk, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Shija Kevin Kuhumba, Nandera Ernest Mhando
1 citations
HEC Forum
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

Responding to Moral Challenges in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinical Ethics Support Needs at Three Tanzanian Hospitals

Bert Molewijk, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Shija Kevin Kuhumba, Nandera Ernest Mhando
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) encounter various moral challenges in clinical practice. In various countries, clinical ethics support (CES) services are developed to support HCPs. One of these CES services is clinical ethics committees (CECs): they address moral challenges faced in healthcare settings and offer support for HCPs. However, in Tanzania, CECs have not yet been implemented. For implementation purposes, greater knowledge about how healthcare professionals navigate and respond to moral challenges, their understanding of CECs, and what they perceive as key needs for implementing CECs in hospitals, are valuable. This study explores HCPs' ways of dealing with their moral challenges at the moment and identifies key needs for establishing CECs in Tanzanian healthcare settings in the near future. The findings show that various implicit ways have been acknowledged as being useful in addressing moral challenges (e.g., regular meetings, family conferences, social welfare units, hospital procedures and guidelines, as well as consulting legal and management units). In addition, HCPs reported that a necessity exists for implementing more formal and systematic modalities to address moral challenges in clinical settings. The research in this paper has served as a preparation for establishing the first CEC in Tanzanian healthcare settings.

HEC ForumVol. 38(1)
University of Dar es Salaam (TZ), University of Oslo (NO), University of Agder (NO), Cal Humanities (US), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (TZ), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Universitetet i Oslo
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.