Zero–Average Dynamics Technique Applied to the Buck–Boost Converter: Results on Periodicity, Bifurcations, and Chaotic Behavior

This study addresses chaos control in a Buck–Boost converter using ZAD technique and FPIC. The system analysis identified 1-periodic orbits and observed the occurrence of flip bifurcations, indicating chaotic behavior characterized by sensitivity to initial conditions. To mitigate these instabilities, FPIC was successfully applied, stabilizing periodic orbits and significantly reducing chaos in the system. Numerical simulations verified the presence of chaos, confirmed by positive Lyapunov exponents, and demonstrated the effectiveness of the applied control methods. Steady-state and transient responses of the open-loop model and experimental system were evaluated, showing a strong correlation between them. Under varying load conditions, the numerical model accurately predicted the converter’s real dynamics, validating the proposed approach. Additionally, closed-loop control with ZAD exhibited robust performance, maintaining stable inductor current even during abrupt load changes, thus achieving effective control in non-minimum phase systems. This work contributes to the design of robust control strategies for power converters, optimizing their stability and dynamic response in applications that require precise management of power under variable conditions. Finally, a comparison was made between the performance of the Buck–Boost converter controlled with ZAD and the one controlled by PID. It was observed that both controllers effectively regulate the current, with a steady-state error of less than 1%. However, the system controlled with ZAD maintains a fixed switching frequency, whereas the PID-controlled system lacks a fixed switching frequency and operates with a very high PWM frequency. This high frequency in the PID-controlled system presents a disadvantage, as it leads to issues such as chattering, duty cycle saturation, and consequently, overheating of the MOSFET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082051
Primary Topic
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zero–Average Dynamics Technique Applied to the Buck–Boost Converter: Results on Periodicity, Bifurcations, and Chaotic Behavior

Fredy E. Hoyos, Simeón Casanova Trujillo, Diego A. Londoño Patiño
Energies
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
article

Zero–Average Dynamics Technique Applied to the Buck–Boost Converter: Results on Periodicity, Bifurcations, and Chaotic Behavior

Fredy E. Hoyos, Simeón Casanova Trujillo, Diego A. Londoño Patiño
article en

Abstract

This study addresses chaos control in a Buck–Boost converter using ZAD technique and FPIC. The system analysis identified 1-periodic orbits and observed the occurrence of flip bifurcations, indicating chaotic behavior characterized by sensitivity to initial conditions. To mitigate these instabilities, FPIC was successfully applied, stabilizing periodic orbits and significantly reducing chaos in the system. Numerical simulations verified the presence of chaos, confirmed by positive Lyapunov exponents, and demonstrated the effectiveness of the applied control methods. Steady-state and transient responses of the open-loop model and experimental system were evaluated, showing a strong correlation between them. Under varying load conditions, the numerical model accurately predicted the converter’s real dynamics, validating the proposed approach. Additionally, closed-loop control with ZAD exhibited robust performance, maintaining stable inductor current even during abrupt load changes, thus achieving effective control in non-minimum phase systems. This work contributes to the design of robust control strategies for power converters, optimizing their stability and dynamic response in applications that require precise management of power under variable conditions. Finally, a comparison was made between the performance of the Buck–Boost converter controlled with ZAD and the one controlled by PID. It was observed that both controllers effectively regulate the current, with a steady-state error of less than 1%. However, the system controlled with ZAD maintains a fixed switching frequency, whereas the PID-controlled system lacks a fixed switching frequency and operates with a very high PWM frequency. This high frequency in the PID-controlled system presents a disadvantage, as it leads to issues such as chattering, duty cycle saturation, and consequently, overheating of the MOSFET.

EnergiesVol. 18(8)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.