Geospatial Analysis of Effects of Flooding in Gasabo District; A Case of Bumbogo Sector

This study conducted a geospatial analysis of flooding effects in Bumbogo Sector, Gasabo District, using data from a sample of 99 respondents selected from a population of 7,066 individuals aged 21 and above through both probability and non-probability sampling. Data were gathered through GIS, remote sensing, and surveys and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. In mapping flood-prone areas, findings revealed that key contributors to flooding include rainfall (mean = 3.33), topography/elevation (3.24), land/soil cover (3.36), proximity to water bodies (3.33), and human activities (3.12). The study highlighted that intense rainfall, steep slopes, and unregulated urbanization significantly heighten flood risks, emphasizing the critical role of geospatial tools in continuous flood risk assessment. When evaluating environmental effects, respondents strongly agreed that flooding leads to pollution (mean = 3.06), soil erosion (3.07), habitat destruction (3.09), landslides (3.11), and biodiversity loss (3.07). Economically, property damage (3.98), infrastructure destruction (3.96), crop losses (3.11), and livestock losses (3.94) were major concerns. Human and social impacts included loss of life (3.54), health risks (3.44), disruption of education (3.53), and displacement or homelessness (3.44). Statistical analysis revealed a strong and significant relationship between causes and flood effects. The Pearson correlation coefficient between causes and environmental effects was 0.715 (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant positive relationship. For economic effects, the coefficient was 0.883 (p < 0.01), indicating a very strong correlation. The relationship between causes and human/social effects also showed a strong positive correlation at 0.704 (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that increases in the underlying flood causes result in proportional increases in environmental, economic, and social impacts. Spatial elements such as topography and land use further mediate these effects. The study confirms existing literature and calls for targeted, location-specific flood mitigation strategies. It recommends the use of geospatial analysis in planning and proactive risk management in flood-prone zones like Bumbogo Sector. Keywords: Geospatial Analysis, Flooding, Flood Prone Area

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2477
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geospatial Analysis of Effects of Flooding in Gasabo District; A Case of Bumbogo Sector

Journal of Agriculture
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Geospatial Analysis of Effects of Flooding in Gasabo District; A Case of Bumbogo Sector

article en

Abstract

This study conducted a geospatial analysis of flooding effects in Bumbogo Sector, Gasabo District, using data from a sample of 99 respondents selected from a population of 7,066 individuals aged 21 and above through both probability and non-probability sampling. Data were gathered through GIS, remote sensing, and surveys and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. In mapping flood-prone areas, findings revealed that key contributors to flooding include rainfall (mean = 3.33), topography/elevation (3.24), land/soil cover (3.36), proximity to water bodies (3.33), and human activities (3.12). The study highlighted that intense rainfall, steep slopes, and unregulated urbanization significantly heighten flood risks, emphasizing the critical role of geospatial tools in continuous flood risk assessment. When evaluating environmental effects, respondents strongly agreed that flooding leads to pollution (mean = 3.06), soil erosion (3.07), habitat destruction (3.09), landslides (3.11), and biodiversity loss (3.07). Economically, property damage (3.98), infrastructure destruction (3.96), crop losses (3.11), and livestock losses (3.94) were major concerns. Human and social impacts included loss of life (3.54), health risks (3.44), disruption of education (3.53), and displacement or homelessness (3.44). Statistical analysis revealed a strong and significant relationship between causes and flood effects. The Pearson correlation coefficient between causes and environmental effects was 0.715 (p < 0.01), suggesting a significant positive relationship. For economic effects, the coefficient was 0.883 (p < 0.01), indicating a very strong correlation. The relationship between causes and human/social effects also showed a strong positive correlation at 0.704 (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that increases in the underlying flood causes result in proportional increases in environmental, economic, and social impacts. Spatial elements such as topography and land use further mediate these effects. The study confirms existing literature and calls for targeted, location-specific flood mitigation strategies. It recommends the use of geospatial analysis in planning and proactive risk management in flood-prone zones like Bumbogo Sector. Keywords: Geospatial Analysis, Flooding, Flood Prone Area

Journal of AgricultureVol. 9(2)
University of Lay Adventists of Kigali (RW)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.