Interaction between the Legislative and Executive Branches of Power in Russia in Late 1997 — Early 1998: the Experience of the New Format

The article examines the attempt of the legislative and executive branches of power in Russia to find a new format of interaction in late 1997 — early 1998. In 1997, President Boris Yeltsin and the government he reorganized initiated large-scale socio-economic reforms, but faced confrontation with deputies of the oppositional State Duma. The conflict culminated in the beginning of the no-confidence vote procedure in October 1997, which in the long term could lead to the resignation of the government or the dissolution of the lower chamber of parliament. Facing a possible political crisis, the government, the chambers of the Federal Assembly and the President of Russia were forced to begin negotiations. They resulted in an agreement on a new format of intergovernmental consultations and the mechanisms aimed to ensure its functioning. Two advisory bodies were established: the “Big four” committee, comprising the president, the head of government and the chairmen of the chambers of parliament; and also a broader conference (the socalled “round table”) convened to resolve the most contentious issues. The article demonstrates that the period of their most active functioning was an important milestone in the attempts of the branches of power to work out a compromise and had long-term political consequences. The schemes that were elaborated allowed the political system to overcome a crisis, however, that was not enough to achieve the compromises necessary to implement a consistent reform policy. As a result, in spring 1998 Yeltsin’s policy underwent an abrupt turn. Having abandoned his moderator role, he appointed a new government, effectively pushing it through the State Duma, which actually meant the collapse of all agreements on a new format of interaction. Nevertheless, some of its mechanisms have remained and were subsequently repeatedly used by the branches of power to search for compromises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2025-116-1-135-150
Primary Topic
Russia and Soviet political economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction between the Legislative and Executive Branches of Power in Russia in Late 1997 — Early 1998: the Experience of the New Format

Alexander Berlov
The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
Russia and Soviet political economy
article

Interaction between the Legislative and Executive Branches of Power in Russia in Late 1997 — Early 1998: the Experience of the New Format

Alexander Berlov
article en

Abstract

The article examines the attempt of the legislative and executive branches of power in Russia to find a new format of interaction in late 1997 — early 1998. In 1997, President Boris Yeltsin and the government he reorganized initiated large-scale socio-economic reforms, but faced confrontation with deputies of the oppositional State Duma. The conflict culminated in the beginning of the no-confidence vote procedure in October 1997, which in the long term could lead to the resignation of the government or the dissolution of the lower chamber of parliament. Facing a possible political crisis, the government, the chambers of the Federal Assembly and the President of Russia were forced to begin negotiations. They resulted in an agreement on a new format of intergovernmental consultations and the mechanisms aimed to ensure its functioning. Two advisory bodies were established: the “Big four” committee, comprising the president, the head of government and the chairmen of the chambers of parliament; and also a broader conference (the socalled “round table”) convened to resolve the most contentious issues. The article demonstrates that the period of their most active functioning was an important milestone in the attempts of the branches of power to work out a compromise and had long-term political consequences. The schemes that were elaborated allowed the political system to overcome a crisis, however, that was not enough to achieve the compromises necessary to implement a consistent reform policy. As a result, in spring 1998 Yeltsin’s policy underwent an abrupt turn. Having abandoned his moderator role, he appointed a new government, effectively pushing it through the State Duma, which actually meant the collapse of all agreements on a new format of interaction. Nevertheless, some of its mechanisms have remained and were subsequently repeatedly used by the branches of power to search for compromises.

The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics PoliteiaVol. 1(116)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Russia and Soviet political economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interaction between the Legislative and Executive Branches of Power in Russia in Late 1997 — Early 1998: the Experience of the New Format — Alexander Berlov · The Journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS