Cut-off evaluation of ID Screen Mycoplasma bovis ELISA for use on bulk tank milk in New Zealand

Repeated testing of bulk tank milk (BTM) samples and testing of serum samples has played a major role in New Zealand's Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) eradication programme. We evaluated the performance of the ID Screen Mycoplasma bovis indirect ELISA on BTM samples and identified the maximal diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) for testing for antibodies against M. bovis in New Zealand dairy herds. Also, we investigated factors influencing DSe over the milking season and associated with the presence of antibodies against M. bovis in a sample. Data from 63 dairy herds were analysed using Bayesian latent class analysis for two conditionally dependent tests. A BTM ELISA sample-to-positive ratio (SP%) cut-off of 24 was the estimated optimal threshold yielding the optimal combination of DSe and DSp - a DSe of 78.6 % (95 % highest posterior density [HPD] interval, 50.8-93.5) and a DSp of 98.5 % (95 % HPD interval, 97.2-99.4). The presence of antibodies against M. bovis in a BTM sample was associated with herd size and the somatic cell count concentration. DSe varied markedly throughout the milking season, and was dependent on the total BTM sample volume at the time of sampling. The DSe of the ID Screen ELISA was highest for samples tested during the early and mid-stages of the milking season, and when milk vat volumes were low relative to the number of cows in milk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106528
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cut-off evaluation of ID Screen Mycoplasma bovis ELISA for use on bulk tank milk in New Zealand

Nadeeka K. Wawegama, Ayesha Salgadu, Kate Sawford, Glenn Francis Browning et al.
2 citations
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Microbial infections and disease research
2.37
article

Cut-off evaluation of ID Screen Mycoplasma bovis ELISA for use on bulk tank milk in New Zealand

Nadeeka K. Wawegama, Ayesha Salgadu, Kate Sawford, Glenn Francis Browning, Amy Burroughs, Simon M. Firestone, Mark A. Stevenson, Tim Johnstone
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Repeated testing of bulk tank milk (BTM) samples and testing of serum samples has played a major role in New Zealand's Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) eradication programme. We evaluated the performance of the ID Screen Mycoplasma bovis indirect ELISA on BTM samples and identified the maximal diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) for testing for antibodies against M. bovis in New Zealand dairy herds. Also, we investigated factors influencing DSe over the milking season and associated with the presence of antibodies against M. bovis in a sample. Data from 63 dairy herds were analysed using Bayesian latent class analysis for two conditionally dependent tests. A BTM ELISA sample-to-positive ratio (SP%) cut-off of 24 was the estimated optimal threshold yielding the optimal combination of DSe and DSp - a DSe of 78.6 % (95 % highest posterior density [HPD] interval, 50.8-93.5) and a DSp of 98.5 % (95 % HPD interval, 97.2-99.4). The presence of antibodies against M. bovis in a BTM sample was associated with herd size and the somatic cell count concentration. DSe varied markedly throughout the milking season, and was dependent on the total BTM sample volume at the time of sampling. The DSe of the ID Screen ELISA was highest for samples tested during the early and mid-stages of the milking season, and when milk vat volumes were low relative to the number of cows in milk.

Preventive Veterinary MedicineVol. 240
Fonterra (New Zealand) (NZ), The University of Melbourne (AU), Ministry for Primary Industries (NZ)
University of Melbourne
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Microbial infections and disease research
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.