Evaluation of Thyromental Height for Predicting Difficult Airway

Introduction: A difficult airway is a common challenge during general anesthesia.Various predictors of difficult intubation are available, but their reliability varies.This study aimed to evaluate the Thyromental Height Test (TMHT) for predictinga difficult airway and compare it to the Modified Mallampati Test (MMT). Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 139 patients aged16šC80 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia (ASA I/II).A thyromental height <50 mm and MMT scores of III/IV were classified as difficultairways. Difficult intubation was defined using Cormack-Lehane grades III/IV.Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for both tests. Results: Difficult intubation occurred in 30.9% of patients. TMHT showed asensitivity of 95.34%, specificity of 92.70%, and an AUC of 0.946, outperformingMMT (sensitivity 48.83%, specificity 92.70%). TMHT also demonstrated higherpositive (85.41%) and negative (97.80%) predictive values. Conclusion: The Thyromental Height Test is a reliable predictor of difficultairways, offering superior accuracy compared to the Modified Mallampati Test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nepal Medical Journal
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37080/nmj.231
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Thyromental Height for Predicting Difficult Airway

Apurwa Karki, Sita Bhusal, Gaurav Ratna Bajracharya, Jay Prakash Thakur
Nepal Medical Journal
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Evaluation of Thyromental Height for Predicting Difficult Airway

Apurwa Karki, Sita Bhusal, Gaurav Ratna Bajracharya, Jay Prakash Thakur
article en

Abstract

Introduction: A difficult airway is a common challenge during general anesthesia.Various predictors of difficult intubation are available, but their reliability varies.This study aimed to evaluate the Thyromental Height Test (TMHT) for predictinga difficult airway and compare it to the Modified Mallampati Test (MMT). Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 139 patients aged16šC80 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia (ASA I/II).A thyromental height <50 mm and MMT scores of III/IV were classified as difficultairways. Difficult intubation was defined using Cormack-Lehane grades III/IV.Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for both tests. Results: Difficult intubation occurred in 30.9% of patients. TMHT showed asensitivity of 95.34%, specificity of 92.70%, and an AUC of 0.946, outperformingMMT (sensitivity 48.83%, specificity 92.70%). TMHT also demonstrated higherpositive (85.41%) and negative (97.80%) predictive values. Conclusion: The Thyromental Height Test is a reliable predictor of difficultairways, offering superior accuracy compared to the Modified Mallampati Test.

Nepal Medical JournalVol. 8(1)
Bir Hospital (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Thyromental Height for Predicting Difficult Airway — Apurwa Karki, Sita Bhusal, et al. · Nepal Medical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS