Are Pipeline Operators Over-Relying on the In-Line Inspection?

Abstract In-line inspection (ILI) is a rapidly evolving field that leverages advancements in inspection technologies, software development, and miniaturization of electronic components to create more accurate, robust, and autonomous tools. These advancements have expanded the capabilities of ILI systems to detect, identify, and size a wider range of pipeline anomalies, and to overcome many other previous limitations. However, factors such as regulatory requirements, cost considerations, and, sometimes, lack of competency on risk management, have led to an increasing reliance on ILI data as the primary input for managing the corrosion control barriers, which is slowly but steadily leading to a reactive approach to pipeline integrity management. This paper examines the critical role that risk assessment (RA) plays in preserving the pipeline’s integrity and how overreliance on ILI for corrosion management can undermine this function. The paper advocates for a balanced approach that integrates ILI with robust RA to ensure the proactive management of corrosion threats.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5006/c2025-00263
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Pipeline Operators Over-Relying on the In-Line Inspection?

Omar Aguilar-Mejía
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Are Pipeline Operators Over-Relying on the In-Line Inspection?

Omar Aguilar-Mejía
article en

Abstract

Abstract In-line inspection (ILI) is a rapidly evolving field that leverages advancements in inspection technologies, software development, and miniaturization of electronic components to create more accurate, robust, and autonomous tools. These advancements have expanded the capabilities of ILI systems to detect, identify, and size a wider range of pipeline anomalies, and to overcome many other previous limitations. However, factors such as regulatory requirements, cost considerations, and, sometimes, lack of competency on risk management, have led to an increasing reliance on ILI data as the primary input for managing the corrosion control barriers, which is slowly but steadily leading to a reactive approach to pipeline integrity management. This paper examines the critical role that risk assessment (RA) plays in preserving the pipeline’s integrity and how overreliance on ILI for corrosion management can undermine this function. The paper advocates for a balanced approach that integrates ILI with robust RA to ensure the proactive management of corrosion threats.

Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are Pipeline Operators Over-Relying on the In-Line Inspection? — Omar Aguilar-Mejía · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS