Devaluing Sustainability: Financialized Disclosure Governance and Transparency in Modern Slavery and Climate Change

The long-awaited European Supply Chain Act, known as the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), entered into force on July 25, 2024, has been criticized as a missed opportunity to advance more impactful protections for vulnerable stakeholders of global value chain capitalism. Concluding a lengthy, contested legislative process, the Directive’s adoption reflects the diverse trends that make up global value chain (GVC) governance today: disclosure legislation, international soft law, and private actors’ corporate sustainability codes of conduct. Despite an abundance of norms, egregious human and environmental rights violations in and around GVCs persist, and devastating factory accidents, worker deaths, and exploitation along with irreparable harm to lands and water continue. This article assesses the prevailing regulatory approach against the background of deeply rooted accounting and discounting methods that discourage actors from adopting substantial—and costly—measures today with a view to long-term benefits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Political Economy
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5070/lp60065156
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Devaluing Sustainability: Financialized Disclosure Governance and Transparency in Modern Slavery and Climate Change

Peer Zumbansen
2 citations
Journal of Law and Political Economy
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.42
article

Devaluing Sustainability: Financialized Disclosure Governance and Transparency in Modern Slavery and Climate Change

Peer Zumbansen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The long-awaited European Supply Chain Act, known as the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), entered into force on July 25, 2024, has been criticized as a missed opportunity to advance more impactful protections for vulnerable stakeholders of global value chain capitalism. Concluding a lengthy, contested legislative process, the Directive’s adoption reflects the diverse trends that make up global value chain (GVC) governance today: disclosure legislation, international soft law, and private actors’ corporate sustainability codes of conduct. Despite an abundance of norms, egregious human and environmental rights violations in and around GVCs persist, and devastating factory accidents, worker deaths, and exploitation along with irreparable harm to lands and water continue. This article assesses the prevailing regulatory approach against the background of deeply rooted accounting and discounting methods that discourage actors from adopting substantial—and costly—measures today with a view to long-term benefits.

Journal of Law and Political EconomyVol. 5(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Devaluing Sustainability: Financialized Disclosure Governance and Transparency in Modern Slavery and Climate Change — Peer Zumbansen · Journal of Law and Political Economy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS