Perceptual judgments are resistant to the advisor’s perceived level of trustworthiness: A deep fake approach

As we navigate our environment, we frequently make spontaneous judgments about other's characteristics. Trustworthiness is a particularly important trait, often judged instantly and used to guide decisions, especially in uncertain situations. Although the impact of trustworthiness on social behaviour is well-documented, its influence on more fundamental cognitive processes, such as perceptual decision-making, remains unclear. The present study aims to fill this gap. In the first experiment (N = 100), we validated a new trustworthiness manipulation by applying deep fake technology to create animated versions of perceptually trustworthy, untrustworthy, and neutral static computer-generated faces. In the second experiment (N = 199), the deep fake procedure was applied to a new set of trustworthy and untrustworthy faces that served as advisors during a perceptual decision-making task. Here participants had to indicate the direction of dots that were either moving coherently to the left or the right (i.e., random dot motion task). Contrary to our predictions, participants did not align more with the advice of trustworthy advisors than that of untrustworthy advisors. While participants made faster decisions and reported greater confidence when aligning with the advice, these effects were not influenced by the advisor's perceived trustworthiness. We integrate our findings within theoretical frameworks of advice taking, domain specificity of facial trustworthiness, and task requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319039
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptual judgments are resistant to the advisor’s perceived level of trustworthiness: A deep fake approach

Sam Verschooren, Mathias Van der Biest, Marcel Braß, Frederick Verbruggen
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
2.12
article

Perceptual judgments are resistant to the advisor’s perceived level of trustworthiness: A deep fake approach

Sam Verschooren, Mathias Van der Biest, Marcel Braß, Frederick Verbruggen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As we navigate our environment, we frequently make spontaneous judgments about other's characteristics. Trustworthiness is a particularly important trait, often judged instantly and used to guide decisions, especially in uncertain situations. Although the impact of trustworthiness on social behaviour is well-documented, its influence on more fundamental cognitive processes, such as perceptual decision-making, remains unclear. The present study aims to fill this gap. In the first experiment (N = 100), we validated a new trustworthiness manipulation by applying deep fake technology to create animated versions of perceptually trustworthy, untrustworthy, and neutral static computer-generated faces. In the second experiment (N = 199), the deep fake procedure was applied to a new set of trustworthy and untrustworthy faces that served as advisors during a perceptual decision-making task. Here participants had to indicate the direction of dots that were either moving coherently to the left or the right (i.e., random dot motion task). Contrary to our predictions, participants did not align more with the advice of trustworthy advisors than that of untrustworthy advisors. While participants made faster decisions and reported greater confidence when aligning with the advice, these effects were not influenced by the advisor's perceived trustworthiness. We integrate our findings within theoretical frameworks of advice taking, domain specificity of facial trustworthiness, and task requirements.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
Ghent University (BE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Einstein Stiftung Berlin, Vlaamse regering
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.