Joint Physical Custody and Children’s Physical and Mental Health

Abstract Background This study examines the effects of joint physical custody (JPC) on the physical and mental health of children following divorce, using comprehensive survey data from Wisconsin. Objective Informed by Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological model, the study seeks to understand the impact of custody arrangements on children’s health outcomes post-divorce. Prior research has suggested potential benefits of JPC, but there is a need for more robust analysis to control for selection biases and other confounding factors. Method The analytic sample is constructed to facilitate comparisons between mothers with shared versus sole placement. The parents in the Wisconsin data are included in the analytic sample based on survey measures reflecting the focal child’s actual placement arrangement at the time of the survey. The final data include 374 parents consisting of 170 sole-placement mothers and 204 shared placement mothers. This study employs robust probit regression models and Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) to account for selection biases. Descriptive statistics and multivariate models are used to analyze survey data collected from Wisconsin. The analytic approach ensures methodological rigor by adjusting for potential confounders and providing a more accurate estimate of the relationships under investigation. Results The findings reveal that children in JPC arrangements exhibit significantly better mental health outcomes compared to those in sole custody. Specifically, 79.8% of children in JPC reported good mental health versus 67.9% in sole custody. Multivariate probit and IPW models corroborated these results. High-quality co-parenting relationships, more prevalent in JPC scenarios, were not clearly linked to these improved outcomes. Conclusions The study underscores the importance of nuanced policy approaches that consider individual family contexts and parental relationship quality. The findings raise questions concerning the need for interventions like co-parenting workshops to promote effective communication and collaboration between divorced parents. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of custody arrangements on children’s well-being and to inform evidence-based policy decisions. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how JPC and co-parenting quality influence children’s mental and physical health post-divorce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child & Youth Care Forum
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-025-09863-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joint Physical Custody and Children’s Physical and Mental Health

Quentin H. Riser
1 citations
Child & Youth Care Forum
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
4.20
article

Joint Physical Custody and Children’s Physical and Mental Health

Quentin H. Riser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background This study examines the effects of joint physical custody (JPC) on the physical and mental health of children following divorce, using comprehensive survey data from Wisconsin. Objective Informed by Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological model, the study seeks to understand the impact of custody arrangements on children’s health outcomes post-divorce. Prior research has suggested potential benefits of JPC, but there is a need for more robust analysis to control for selection biases and other confounding factors. Method The analytic sample is constructed to facilitate comparisons between mothers with shared versus sole placement. The parents in the Wisconsin data are included in the analytic sample based on survey measures reflecting the focal child’s actual placement arrangement at the time of the survey. The final data include 374 parents consisting of 170 sole-placement mothers and 204 shared placement mothers. This study employs robust probit regression models and Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) to account for selection biases. Descriptive statistics and multivariate models are used to analyze survey data collected from Wisconsin. The analytic approach ensures methodological rigor by adjusting for potential confounders and providing a more accurate estimate of the relationships under investigation. Results The findings reveal that children in JPC arrangements exhibit significantly better mental health outcomes compared to those in sole custody. Specifically, 79.8% of children in JPC reported good mental health versus 67.9% in sole custody. Multivariate probit and IPW models corroborated these results. High-quality co-parenting relationships, more prevalent in JPC scenarios, were not clearly linked to these improved outcomes. Conclusions The study underscores the importance of nuanced policy approaches that consider individual family contexts and parental relationship quality. The findings raise questions concerning the need for interventions like co-parenting workshops to promote effective communication and collaboration between divorced parents. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of custody arrangements on children’s well-being and to inform evidence-based policy decisions. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how JPC and co-parenting quality influence children’s mental and physical health post-divorce.

Child & Youth Care ForumVol. 54(6)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.