Enabling Interoperability in Heterogeneous IoT Networks through Standardization Protocols

The Internet of Things is a tremendous technology paradigm due to its ability to help perform intercommunication and coordination across different devices and systems. But nowadays, as the number of IoT devices and applications escalates, one of the key challenges is interoperability between heterogeneous IoT networks different devices and delivery systems that need to communicate and exchange data. This definition necessitates a protocol for standardization, be it implicit or explicit. Standardization protocols would lead to a corresponding need for seamless interoperability between heterogeneous IoT networks. This technical abstract proposes a recommendation for addressing this issue. We then discuss how standardization helps to ensure compatibility and smooth interoperation among IoT devices and systems. We also talk about the various standardization protocols in the marketplace, including MQTT, CoAP and OPC UA, and their compatibility with different IoT devices and platforms. We also discuss the challenges and limitations of deploying standardization protocols for heterogeneous IoT networks that arise due to miscellaneous, non-premium network IO and standards-protocols non-uniformity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/autocom64127.2025.10957687
Citations
1
Primary Topic
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling Interoperability in Heterogeneous IoT Networks through Standardization Protocols

Bijay Kumar Paikaray, Trapty Agarwal, Ashu Katyal, Rajat Saini et al.
1 citations
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
1.49
article

Enabling Interoperability in Heterogeneous IoT Networks through Standardization Protocols

Bijay Kumar Paikaray, Trapty Agarwal, Ashu Katyal, Rajat Saini, K S Kiran, K. Srilatha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Internet of Things is a tremendous technology paradigm due to its ability to help perform intercommunication and coordination across different devices and systems. But nowadays, as the number of IoT devices and applications escalates, one of the key challenges is interoperability between heterogeneous IoT networks different devices and delivery systems that need to communicate and exchange data. This definition necessitates a protocol for standardization, be it implicit or explicit. Standardization protocols would lead to a corresponding need for seamless interoperability between heterogeneous IoT networks. This technical abstract proposes a recommendation for addressing this issue. We then discuss how standardization helps to ensure compatibility and smooth interoperation among IoT devices and systems. We also talk about the various standardization protocols in the marketplace, including MQTT, CoAP and OPC UA, and their compatibility with different IoT devices and platforms. We also discuss the challenges and limitations of deploying standardization protocols for heterogeneous IoT networks that arise due to miscellaneous, non-premium network IO and standards-protocols non-uniformity.

Jain University (IN), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Maharishi University of Management and Technology (IN), Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enabling Interoperability in Heterogeneous IoT Networks through Standardization Protocols — Bijay Kumar Paikaray, Trapty Agarwal, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS