Do pay-for-performance schemes improve quality in community pharmacy? A mixed-methods study exploring stakeholder perspectives on implementation of the nationwide Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) in England?
The primary incentive for PQS engagement revolved around income stability for employers, with some positive impact achieved, but obstacles concerning resource implications and sustainability persist. Considering concerns about the viability of community pharmacy and the importance of increasing the scope of pharmaceutical services, these implementation challenges should lead policy-makers to question how best to incentivise quality.
Authors
- Ali Hindi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1076-435X)
- Sally Jacobs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6199-5748)
- Jon Gibson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4177-8049)
- Katie Robinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-9857)
- Ellen Schafheutle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-0888)
- Aidan Moss
- Emma Lovatt
Institutions
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- ICF International (United Kingdom) (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319215
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.82