Do pay-for-performance schemes improve quality in community pharmacy? A mixed-methods study exploring stakeholder perspectives on implementation of the nationwide Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) in England?

The primary incentive for PQS engagement revolved around income stability for employers, with some positive impact achieved, but obstacles concerning resource implications and sustainability persist. Considering concerns about the viability of community pharmacy and the importance of increasing the scope of pharmaceutical services, these implementation challenges should lead policy-makers to question how best to incentivise quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319215
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do pay-for-performance schemes improve quality in community pharmacy? A mixed-methods study exploring stakeholder perspectives on implementation of the nationwide Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) in England?

Ali Hindi, Sally Jacobs, Jon Gibson, Katie Robinson et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
2.82
article

Do pay-for-performance schemes improve quality in community pharmacy? A mixed-methods study exploring stakeholder perspectives on implementation of the nationwide Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) in England?

Ali Hindi, Sally Jacobs, Jon Gibson, Katie Robinson, Ellen Schafheutle, Aidan Moss, Emma Lovatt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The primary incentive for PQS engagement revolved around income stability for employers, with some positive impact achieved, but obstacles concerning resource implications and sustainability persist. Considering concerns about the viability of community pharmacy and the importance of increasing the scope of pharmaceutical services, these implementation challenges should lead policy-makers to question how best to incentivise quality.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), ICF International (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do pay-for-performance schemes improve quality in community pharmacy? A mixed-methods study exploring stakeholder perspectives on implementation of the nationwide Pharmacy Quality Scheme (PQS) in England? — Ali Hindi, Sally Jacobs, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS